Skip to main content

Security report for reiskorn.at

Other · Austria

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Email security, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.reiskorn.at is a small business site hosted on the Wix platform, targeting an Austrian audience. The site appears to be in German language and uses standard Wix technologies including JavaScript, CSS, and Wix's proprietary scripts. The business description and detailed services are not clearly extractable from the provided HTML content, indicating minimal content presence or content loading dynamically beyond the provided snapshot. The technical infrastructure is typical for Wix-hosted sites, with moderate performance and basic mobile optimization. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and some cookie handling scripts, but lacks explicit security headers and publicly disclosed security policies. Privacy compliance is weak due to absence of visible privacy or cookie policies and consent mechanisms. Business credibility is moderate but limited by lack of visible contact information and trust indicators. Overall, the site is functional but would benefit from enhanced content, privacy disclosures, and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
48/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  4. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching reiskorn.at

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
35
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
48
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business behind www.reiskorn.at appears to be a small Austrian entity, likely in a traditional or local sector given the domain and language. The site does not reveal detailed market positioning or business model specifics in the accessible content. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries. The use of Wix suggests a focus on ease of deployment over custom infrastructure. Marketing is supported by Facebook Pixel tracking, indicating some digital marketing efforts. The lack of detailed contact or legal information limits assessment of business maturity and compliance.

Security posture

Security maturity is basic with HTTPS enforced and some cookie management scripts to protect sensitive cookies. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as HSTS, X-Content-Type-Options, and CSP reduces the security robustness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. The site lacks publicly available incident response or security policies, which is a compliance gap. The use of third-party scripts like Facebook Pixel introduces moderate tracking risks. Overall, the security posture is functional but could be significantly improved with standard security headers and privacy disclosures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publicly display a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with GDPR compliance details.
  2. Add explicit security headers including Strict-Transport-Security, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, and Content-Security-Policy.
  3. Provide clear and accessible contact information including company email and phone number to enhance business credibility.
  4. Review and secure all forms and input fields with CSRF protection and input validation.
  5. Establish and publish an incident response policy and security contact channels to improve trust and compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Content quality
poor
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Wix, JavaScript, HTML5, CSS3
Platforms
Wix.com
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Content Security Policy (implied by Wix platform)
  • Cookie handling scripts to restrict sensitive cookies

Analytics and tracking

Services
Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is built on Wix platform with standard Wix scripts and assets.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the homepage HTML content.
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses explicitly found in the provided HTML content.
  4. Facebook Pixel is used for tracking and marketing purposes.
  5. No visible forms or data collection fields detected in the truncated HTML content.
  6. Security headers are minimal but HTTPS is enabled.
  7. No security or incident response policies are publicly disclosed.
  8. Content is minimal and mostly technical scripts and styles; business content is not clearly extracted from the truncated HTML.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Wix platform using standard Wix libraries and scripts. The tech stack includes JavaScript, CSS3, and HTML5 with Wix's proprietary modules for rendering and session management. Performance is moderate with typical Wix loading patterns. Mobile optimization is basic but present. SEO optimization is minimal with no clear structured data or meta tags beyond defaults. Accessibility features are basic. The site uses Facebook Pixel for analytics and marketing tracking. Hosting is managed by Wix, providing reliable infrastructure but limited customization. Technical debt is low due to platform use but limits advanced security and SEO capabilities.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with reiskorn.at. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review reiskorn.at.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.