Unspam Registry Services, Inc · Government · United States
Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.
Registry Compliance operates as a specialized service provider assisting senders in complying with children's protection registry laws specifically in Utah and Michigan. The company, Unspam Registry Services, Inc, has been established since 2004 and maintains a niche position in the compliance and anti-spam legislative consulting market. Their website provides informational resources, account management, and customer support primarily through static content and basic interactive forms. The target audience includes businesses and individuals who send electronic communications subject to these state laws. Technically, the website is built on a simple HTML/CSS/JavaScript stack without modern CMS or frameworks. Hosting is provided by Cloudflare, ensuring basic performance and security benefits. However, the site lacks mobile optimization and advanced accessibility features, indicating room for modernization. SEO and metadata are basic but sufficient for the site's scope. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and has domain transfer protections in place, but it lacks DNSSEC and important security headers. No cookie consent mechanism is present, which may impact privacy compliance. The absence of explicit contact emails and phone numbers reduces direct communication channels. Overall, the security posture is basic but functional for the site's purpose. The overall risk is moderate with no critical vulnerabilities detected. Strategic improvements in security headers, privacy compliance, and mobile optimization would enhance trust and user experience. The domain registration data aligns well with the business history, supporting legitimacy.
Scanned
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes
GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit
TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.
Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions
Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com
This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
€25per month
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.
€39.90one-time
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
Not counted
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Leaked records that mention registrycompliance.com, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for registrycompliance.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with registrycompliance.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review registrycompliance.com.