Skip to main content

Security report for registradores.org

Colegio de Registradores de España · Government · Spain

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

77/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.registradores.org serves as the official portal for the Colegio de Registradores de España, the authoritative body managing property, mercantile, and movable goods registries in Spain. It provides comprehensive information and online services to citizens, entrepreneurs, and legal professionals, positioning itself as a key governmental institution in the Spanish registry sector. The site features a professional design, clear navigation, and multilingual support, reflecting a mature digital presence. Technically, the site is built on the Liferay CMS platform, leveraging modern web technologies such as jQuery, Bootstrap, and FontAwesome. It integrates Google Analytics and Tag Manager for user behavior tracking and employs accessibility features and cookie consent mechanisms to comply with privacy regulations. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and includes cookie consent banners, but lacks explicit security headers and a published security policy or incident response contacts. The WHOIS data is unavailable due to a malformed response, limiting domain registration trust verification. However, the website's content and branding strongly indicate legitimacy and governmental authority. Overall, the site presents a low risk profile with strong trust indicators but could improve security posture by implementing additional headers, publishing security policies, and enhancing DNSSEC deployment.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube, Cloudflare, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching registradores.org

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
70
Email security
87
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
77

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The Colegio de Registradores de España operates as a governmental entity providing registry services critical to property, commercial, and movable goods transactions in Spain. Its market position is authoritative and essential, serving a broad audience including consumers, entrepreneurs, and legal professionals. The business model is service-oriented, focusing on regulatory compliance and public service delivery. The website supports transparency and accessibility, offering multiple online services and information portals. Partnerships with educational and governmental institutions are evident, enhancing its ecosystem. Growth indicators include active content updates and digital service expansion. The organization maintains a strong brand presence and trust through certifications and official social media channels.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to strong security posture with mandatory HTTPS encryption and cookie consent mechanisms in place. However, the absence of visible security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces its defense-in-depth capabilities. No explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is published, which could hinder rapid response to security events. The WHOIS data is incomplete, which is a minor concern but likely due to registry query limitations rather than privacy protection. The use of third-party scripts like Google Analytics is standard but requires ongoing monitoring for vulnerabilities. Overall, the site is secure for general public use but could benefit from enhanced security best practices and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen browser security.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and scripts to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Deploy and verify DNSSEC to enhance domain name system security.
  5. Consider adding a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure program to facilitate responsible reporting.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Colegio de Registradores de España
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Colegio de Registradores de España
Description
Página oficial de los Registradores de la Propiedad, Mercantiles y Bienes Muebles de España. Información y trámites online
Key services
Registro de la Propiedad, Registro Mercantil, Registro de Bienes Muebles, Registro de Condiciones Generales, Registro Público Concursal, Registro de Titularidades Reales, Online registry services and information portals
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Liferay Portal, Bootstrap, FontAwesome, Snap.svg, DataTables, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
Liferay, Bootstrap
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security-related disclaimers in WHOIS

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation
  2. Strong presence of official and governmental branding
  3. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms
  4. Multiple social media and external official links present
  5. No signs of malicious or suspicious content
  6. WHOIS data unavailable, limiting domain registration trust analysis
  7. Good use of modern web technologies and frameworks
  8. No explicit security.txt or incident response contact found
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Liferay CMS platform, utilizing a combination of jQuery, Bootstrap, FontAwesome, and Snap.svg for UI and interactivity. It integrates Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for analytics and tracking. The site is multilingual with proper meta tags and Open Graph data for SEO and social media sharing. Accessibility features and cookie consent mechanisms are implemented, indicating compliance with privacy and accessibility standards. Performance is moderate, with some reliance on external CDNs for libraries. The site is mobile optimized and uses responsive design. Technical debt appears low, but security header implementation and DNSSEC deployment are areas for improvement.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with registradores.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review registradores.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.