Skip to main content

Security report for regionorebrolan.se

Region Örebro län · Government · Sweden

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Region Örebro län operates as the regional government authority for Örebro County in Sweden, providing a broad range of public services including healthcare, regional development, public transportation, and social support. The website serves as a comprehensive portal for residents and stakeholders, offering information, e-services, and contact channels. The organization maintains a strong market position as a public sector entity with a large operational scale and a focus on community well-being. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including JavaScript frameworks, Azure Application Insights for analytics, and Google reCAPTCHA for bot protection. The site is hosted on Microsoft Azure infrastructure, ensuring reliable performance and scalability. The design is responsive and accessible, with good SEO practices and clear navigation. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS, uses reCAPTCHA to mitigate automated abuse, and provides cookie consent mechanisms aligned with GDPR. However, explicit security headers and published security policies are absent, representing areas for improvement. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Overall, the website demonstrates a mature digital presence with strong business credibility and privacy compliance. The absence of WHOIS data for the subdomain is expected and does not detract from legitimacy. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing incident response information, and expanding transparency around security practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Facebook, LinkedIn

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching regionorebrolan.se

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
30
Email security
80
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Region Örebro län is positioned as a key regional government entity serving the public sector in Sweden. Its competitive advantage lies in its comprehensive service offerings across healthcare, transportation, and regional development, supported by digital services and strong community engagement. Revenue streams are primarily public funding and government budgets. The target customers include residents, healthcare professionals, businesses, and public institutions within Örebro County. The organization shows indicators of digital maturity and partnership ecosystems with healthcare and transportation providers. Strategic observations highlight the importance of maintaining trust, compliance, and continuous digital service improvement.

Security posture

The website exhibits a solid security posture with mandatory HTTPS, bot mitigation via Google reCAPTCHA, and GDPR-aligned cookie consent. The lack of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options is a gap that could be exploited in certain attack scenarios. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is publicly available, which could hinder rapid response to security events. Data protection practices appear robust with clear privacy policies and secure handling of contact information. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be enhanced by formalizing security policies and improving header configurations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Regularly review and update cookie consent mechanisms to ensure ongoing GDPR compliance and user trust.
  5. Enhance monitoring and logging capabilities leveraging Azure Application Insights to detect and respond to security incidents promptly.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Region Örebro län
Registration number
2321000164
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Region Örebro län
Description
Region Örebro läns publika webbplats providing public services and information related to healthcare, regional development, transportation, and public support.
Key services
Healthcare services, Regional development, Public transportation, Support and grants, E-services for healthcare
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Azure Application Insights, Google reCAPTCHA v3, Bootstrap (implied by modal and collapse classes), Material Icons
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA v3 for bot protection
  • Cookie consent banner with customization options
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Azure Application Insights
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Azure Application Insights, Google reCAPTCHA
Marketing tools
Azure Application Insights
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a public sector regional government portal for Örebro County, Sweden.
  2. Content is comprehensive, well-structured, and localized in Swedish.
  3. Cookie consent and privacy policies are implemented with GDPR compliance.
  4. No terms of service or explicit security policy pages found.
  5. WHOIS data for the subdomain is missing, but this is expected for subdomains.
  6. Use of modern technologies and analytics tools like Azure Application Insights.
  7. No signs of WAF or content blocking detected.
  8. Contact information is clearly presented with phone, email, and postal address.
  9. Social media presence on Facebook, Instagram, and LinkedIn.
  10. No visible security vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web technologies including JavaScript, Bootstrap framework, and Material Icons. It leverages Microsoft Azure for hosting and analytics, indicating a robust and scalable infrastructure. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, supporting a broad user base. SEO practices are well implemented with meta tags and structured navigation. No CMS was explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Technical risks are minimal but could be reduced by improving security headers and formalizing technical documentation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with regionorebrolan.se. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review regionorebrolan.se.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.