Skip to main content

Security report for regionguadeloupe.fr

Conseil Régional de Guadeloupe · Government · France

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.regionguadeloupe.fr is the official digital presence of the Regional Council of Guadeloupe, serving as a comprehensive portal for regional aids, services, news, and public transport information. It targets a broad audience including local residents, businesses, students, and public sector entities. The site leverages TYPO3 CMS and integrates common web technologies such as jQuery, Google Analytics, and social media SDKs to deliver content and track engagement. While the site is well-structured and professionally designed, it lacks a publicly accessible privacy policy and shows accessibility non-compliance, which are areas for improvement. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but missing some security headers. WHOIS data is unavailable, which slightly impacts trust but the official .fr domain and consistent content support legitimacy.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching regionguadeloupe.fr

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
65
Email security
80
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The Regional Council of Guadeloupe operates as a government entity providing public services and information. Its market position is authoritative within the Guadeloupe region, offering key services such as regional aid guides, e-services, public tenders, and transport schedules. The website acts as a central hub connecting users to partner sites and social media channels, enhancing outreach and service delivery. The business model is non-commercial, focused on public administration and regional development. The presence of multiple partner domains indicates a collaborative ecosystem supporting regional initiatives.

Security posture

The website maintains a basic to moderate security posture with HTTPS enforced and use of reputable third-party scripts. However, the absence of explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No security.txt or incident response contacts are found, limiting transparency for vulnerability reporting. Accessibility issues and missing privacy policy reduce compliance with best practices. Overall, the site is secure enough for informational purposes but could benefit from enhanced security controls and compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy page to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Address accessibility compliance issues to meet legal and usability standards.
  4. Establish and publish an incident response or vulnerability disclosure contact channel.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and update CMS and dependencies to mitigate vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Conseil Régional de Guadeloupe
Description
Official website of the Regional Council of Guadeloupe providing information on regional aids, services, regional actions, transport lines, and regional news.
Key services
Information on regional aids and services, Access to e-services and public tenders, Regional news and agendas, Transport schedules, Public consultations and calls for projects
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
TYPO3 CMS, jQuery, Google Analytics, Facebook SDK, Twitter Widgets, ReadSpeaker
Frameworks
TYPO3 CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
poor
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of external security scripts (Facebook SDK, Twitter widgets) loaded asynchronously

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Facebook SDK, Twitter Widgets
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is official regional government portal for Guadeloupe.
  2. Content is rich and well-structured with multiple sections for aids, services, news, and transport.
  3. No privacy policy page explicitly found, but cookie consent banner is present.
  4. Accessibility is noted as non-compliant on the site.
  5. No security.txt or explicit security policy pages found.
  6. WHOIS data is unavailable or not publicly accessible, limiting domain trust analysis.
  7. Use of multiple social media official channels enhances trust.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on TYPO3 CMS, a mature and extensible content management system, combined with jQuery and asynchronous loading of social media SDKs and analytics scripts. The site uses responsive design techniques and Google Fonts for typography. Performance is moderate with some optimization opportunities. Accessibility is poor, indicating technical debt in compliance. The lack of visible security headers suggests room for improvement in HTTP response configuration. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could be modernized and hardened further.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with regionguadeloupe.fr. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review regionguadeloupe.fr.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.