Zweckverband Regionale Deponie Schwarzwald-Baar-Heuberg · Government · Germany
Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.
The Zweckverband Regionale Deponie Schwarzwald-Baar-Heuberg operates as a regional public authority responsible for the planning, construction, and management of landfill facilities for non-recyclable mineral waste in the Schwarzwald-Baar-Heuberg region of Germany. The website serves as an informational portal for residents, local government, and stakeholders, providing updates on construction progress, legal documents, and contact information. The organization is positioned as a key regional player in waste management with a clear public service mandate. Technically, the website is built on TYPO3 CMS, leveraging common web technologies such as jQuery and Slick Slider for UI components. It is hosted on Schlund Technologies infrastructure, uses HTTPS, and implements a cookie consent mechanism with Matomo analytics for privacy-conscious visitor tracking. The site demonstrates moderate performance and good mobile optimization, though some improvements in accessibility and security headers could enhance its technical maturity. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses cookie consent to comply with GDPR. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. However, the absence of explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms suggests room for improvement in security governance. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a public sector website but could benefit from enhanced transparency and technical controls. The overall risk assessment is low, with the website presenting a trustworthy and professional front for the Zweckverband. Strategic recommendations include implementing security headers, publishing security policies, and maintaining up-to-date software components to further strengthen security and compliance.
Scanned
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
Forces HTTPS connections
What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"
Prevents clickjacking attacks
What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"
Controls resources the browser is allowed to load
What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application
TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.
Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions
Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.
Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer
What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication
Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com
This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
€25per month
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.
€39.90one-time
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
Not counted
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Leaked records that mention regionale-deponie-sbh.de, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for regionale-deponie-sbh.de right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with regionale-deponie-sbh.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review regionale-deponie-sbh.de.