Skip to main content

Security report for region-kromerizsko.cz

Other · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Region Kroměřížsko operates as a regional tourism information portal focused on promoting lesser-known places, events, and cultural experiences in the Kroměřížsko area of the Czech Republic. The website targets tourists and visitors seeking travel tips, local products, and event calendars. It maintains a consistent brand presence with active social media channels and partner acknowledgments. Technically, the site uses modern JavaScript libraries and frameworks such as jQuery, Foundation, Owl Carousel, and integrates Google Analytics and Tag Manager for visitor tracking with a cookie consent mechanism in place. The website is mobile-optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and relevant content. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS and cookie consent but lacks advanced security headers and explicit security policies or incident response contacts. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain legitimacy verification, but the professional presentation and active content suggest a legitimate operation. Overall, the site scores well in content quality, technical implementation, and security posture, with room for improvement in transparency and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, YouTube, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching region-kromerizsko.cz

This scan found 15 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
100
Email security
65
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
40
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The portal serves as a regional tourism promotion platform, likely operated by a local tourism board or destination management organization. Its business model revolves around providing curated travel content, event information, and promoting local products and experiences to attract visitors. The site leverages partnerships with regional entities and government bodies, as evidenced by partner logos and funding acknowledgments. The target audience includes families, tourists, and cultural enthusiasts interested in the Kroměřížsko region. The site’s growth indicators include regular content updates, social media engagement, and integration with regional tourism initiatives. The lack of direct contact information and formal business registration details suggests a focus on informational services rather than commercial transactions.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security posture with mandatory HTTPS usage and a cookie consent mechanism aligned with GDPR requirements. However, it lacks several security best practices such as implementation of security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, etc.), a published security policy, and a vulnerability disclosure channel. No security.txt file or incident response contacts were found, which could hinder effective vulnerability reporting and incident management. The absence of exposed sensitive data and use of modern libraries reduce immediate risks, but the site would benefit from enhanced security controls and transparency to improve trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Publish a formal security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and facilitate vulnerability reporting.
  3. Add a security.txt file at the root domain to provide a standardized vulnerability disclosure channel.
  4. Include clear business contact information such as emails and phone numbers to enhance credibility and user trust.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries to ensure no known vulnerabilities are present.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Tipy na neobjevená místa i výletní trasy v okolí Kroměříže, Holešova, Bystřice p. H. či v Chřibech a Hostýnských vrších. Zkrátka to, co v průvodcích nenajdete!
Key services
Tourist tips and guides, Event calendar, Local product promotion, Educational programs, Instagram and social media engagement
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Foundation framework, Owl Carousel, Lightbox, Google Maps API, Chart.js, Raphael.js, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics
Frameworks
Foundation
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with opt-in/out
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected.
  2. No WHOIS data available, limiting domain registration trust analysis.
  3. Cookie consent implemented with clear user options.
  4. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found on main pages.
  5. Social media presence on Facebook, Instagram, and YouTube.
  6. Use of modern JavaScript libraries and frameworks.
  7. No security.txt or explicit security policy found.
  8. No terms of service page detected.
  9. Content is family-friendly and tourism-focused.
  10. Multiple partner logos and acknowledgments present.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using a combination of modern front-end technologies including jQuery, Foundation framework, Owl Carousel for sliders, Lightbox for image viewing, and Google Maps API for interactive maps. It integrates Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for visitor tracking and marketing analytics. The site is mobile responsive and uses CSS frameworks for layout and styling. Performance is moderate with no critical issues detected, though optimization opportunities exist. The absence of a detected CMS suggests a custom or less common platform. Hosting provider details are not evident from the content. Accessibility features are basic, with room for improvement in semantic markup and ARIA attributes. SEO is supported by meta tags and structured navigation but could benefit from enhanced structured data markup.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with region-kromerizsko.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review region-kromerizsko.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.