Skip to main content

Security report for regery.com

Regery · Technology · United States

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Regery is a specialized domain registrar and hosting provider established in 2017, offering affordable domain registration, SSL certificates, web hosting, and website monitoring services. The company targets individuals and businesses seeking reliable and secure online presence solutions. Their market position is strengthened by a comprehensive control panel, multi-language support, and partnership programs. Technically, the website is built on a custom platform using RequireJS and integrates Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking. The use of Cloudflare DNS and HTTPS ensures good security and performance. Security posture is strong with features like two-factor authentication and free SSL certificates, though some security headers could be improved. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear policies and consent mechanisms. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and well-optimized for SEO and user experience.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of regery.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching regery.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
50
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Regery operates in the competitive domain registration and hosting market with a focus on affordability and security. Their business model includes direct sales, affiliate marketing, and reseller partnerships. The company serves a global audience with multi-currency and multi-language support, indicating growth ambitions. Their service portfolio is broad, covering domain management, SSL provisioning, hosting, and monitoring, which positions them as a one-stop-shop for web presence needs. The presence of structured data and customer ratings enhances trust and SEO. Strategic partnerships and affiliate programs suggest a scalable revenue model. The company is small-sized, US-based, and appears stable with a domain age of over 6 years.

Security posture

Regery demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced, Cloudflare DNS usage, and two-factor authentication availability. The website does not expose sensitive data and uses CAPTCHA to protect forms. However, the absence of explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and a public security policy or security.txt file indicates room for improvement. Incident response contact is available via abuse reporting channels. No vulnerabilities or suspicious patterns were detected in the analysis. Overall, the security measures align well with industry best practices for a domain registrar and hosting provider.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance browser security.
  2. Create and publish a security policy and a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve transparency.
  3. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate risks from vulnerable libraries.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all users.
  5. Expand privacy compliance disclosures to include data retention policies and user rights in more detail.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Regery
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Regery
Description
Regery is a domain registrar and hosting provider offering domain registration, SSL certificates, web hosting, website monitoring, and related services. They provide a control panel for managing domains, SSLs, hosting, and notifications. The company targets individuals and businesses seeking affordable and reliable domain and hosting services.
Key services
Domain registration, SSL certificates, Web hosting, Website monitoring, Email forwarding, URL forwarding, Two-factor authentication
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
RequireJS, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Cloudflare DNS
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Two-factor authentication offered
  • Use of Cloudflare DNS
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of CAPTCHA (Invisible reCAPTCHA)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking mechanisms.
  2. Strong focus on domain registration, SSL certificates, and hosting services.
  3. Good use of structured data and SEO metadata.
  4. Multiple language and currency support indicating international targeting.
  5. Use of modern JavaScript libraries and asynchronous loading for performance.
  6. Contact information and social media links are clearly provided.
  7. No signs of phishing, malware, or suspicious activity.
  8. Security features like 2FA and free SSL certificates are promoted.
  9. Affiliate and partnership programs are actively advertised.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a custom-built platform with RequireJS for modular JavaScript loading, ensuring asynchronous and efficient script management. Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics are integrated for analytics and marketing insights. The site is hosted with Cloudflare DNS, providing DNS security and performance benefits. The site loads quickly and is mobile optimized with responsive design. SEO is well addressed with comprehensive meta tags, Open Graph data, and structured data using schema.org. The control panel and other services are integrated seamlessly. Technical debt appears low, but the lack of some modern security headers and accessibility features suggests opportunities for modernization and compliance improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 71/100Medium28 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with regery.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review regery.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.