Dark web exposure
Add-onLeaked records that mention regelforum.dk, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for regelforum.dk right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Erhvervsstyrelsen · Government · Denmark
Regelforum.dk is the official website of a Danish government advisory forum established in 2019 under the Danish Business Authority (Erhvervsstyrelsen). The forum consists of 21 members representing a broad cross-section of Denmark and focuses on recommending simpler regulatory frameworks for businesses, both at national and EU levels. The website provides comprehensive information about the forum's activities, recommendations, and news updates, targeting Danish businesses and government stakeholders. The site is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and uses Drupal CMS with clear navigation and consistent branding. From a technical perspective, the website employs modern web technologies including Drupal, JavaScript, and CSS, with SVG logos and responsive design. It includes a cookie consent mechanism and uses Piwik Pro for analytics, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. However, some security best practices such as DNSSEC and security headers are not enabled or visible, suggesting room for improvement in security hardening. Security posture is adequate with no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data, but lacks explicit security policies or incident response contacts. Privacy compliance is strong with clear privacy and cookie policies and GDPR adherence. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professional, reflecting its government affiliation and purpose. Strategically, the site should enhance security by enabling DNSSEC, implementing security headers, and publishing a vulnerability disclosure or security policy. These steps will improve trust and resilience against cyber threats while maintaining compliance and user confidence.
Scanned
Both readouts depend on the site's pages, which could not be loaded in this scan.
1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.
TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.
Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions
Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com
This scan found 15 issues across 4 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
€25per month
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.
€39.90one-time
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
Not counted
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Leaked records that mention regelforum.dk, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for regelforum.dk right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with regelforum.dk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review regelforum.dk.