Skip to main content

Security report for redprofs.com

RED Profs · E-commerce · Netherlands

High risk. 3 critical or high findings in Network security and Security headers.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

RED Profs is a specialized Dutch e-commerce company founded in 2013, focusing on selling fire-resistant products for installation, construction, and facility professionals. Their website offers a well-structured online shop with clear product categories and emphasizes fast shipping and expert advice. The company maintains a moderate market position within its niche, leveraging WooCommerce on WordPress with modern web technologies and SEO practices. The site is mobile-optimized and uses cookie consent mechanisms to comply with GDPR requirements, although explicit privacy and terms of service pages are missing. Technically, the website is built on a solid WordPress and WooCommerce infrastructure with Elementor for design. It integrates Google Tag Manager for analytics and uses reputable hosting and domain registration services. The site employs HTTPS with a good SSL configuration and some security best practices, but lacks DNSSEC and advanced security headers. No critical vulnerabilities or suspicious content were detected. From a security perspective, the site shows a good baseline with HTTPS and cookie consent but lacks published security policies and incident response contacts, which could be improved to enhance trust and compliance. The WHOIS data aligns well with the business claims, showing a mature domain with consistent registration details. Overall, RED Profs presents a professional and trustworthy e-commerce platform with room for improvement in privacy compliance and security transparency. Strategic enhancements in these areas would strengthen their market credibility and reduce potential compliance risks.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching redprofs.com

This scan found 14 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
65
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
100
Average
72
After the cap
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

RED Profs operates in a specialized segment of the construction and facility management market, focusing on fire-resistant materials. Their business model is primarily B2B e-commerce, targeting professionals who require certified fire safety products. The company leverages a niche market advantage by offering expert advice and fast delivery, which are key differentiators. Their partnership ecosystem includes recognized brands like Protecta and Promat, enhancing product credibility. The website's content and structure support a clear value proposition, although the absence of formal privacy and security policies may limit trust among privacy-conscious customers. Growth indicators include a mature domain and consistent branding, but further transparency and certifications could improve competitive positioning.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS enforced and clientTransferProhibited domain status. Cookie consent is managed via a reputable GDPR plugin, indicating awareness of privacy regulations. However, the lack of DNSSEC and advanced HTTP security headers suggests room for improvement. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. The absence of published security policies and incident response contacts limits the site's readiness for handling security incidents. Overall, the security maturity is adequate for a small e-commerce business but should be enhanced to meet higher compliance standards and customer expectations.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve GDPR compliance and customer trust.
  2. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  3. Implement additional HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options.
  4. Develop and publish a security policy and incident response plan with clear contact channels for security issues.
  5. Regularly audit and update all plugins and third-party scripts to mitigate vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
RED Profs
Description
Dé webshop voor installatie, bouw en facilitaire professionals. De beste brandwerende producten vind je bij RED Profs.
Key services
Online sales of fire-resistant products, Deskundig advies (expert advice), Fast shipping (next working day if ordered before 13:00)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WooCommerce, Elementor, Google Tag Manager, Complianz GDPR/CCPA plugin, Font Awesome, Google Fonts, WooCommerce Payments
Frameworks
WooCommerce, Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Client transfer prohibited domain status
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Complianz GDPR/CCPA plugin
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional e-commerce platform focused on fire-resistant building products.
  2. Content is in Dutch, targeting Dutch installation, construction, and facility professionals.
  3. No privacy policy or terms of service pages found, which is a compliance gap.
  4. Cookie consent is implemented via Complianz plugin.
  5. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  6. Use of modern web technologies and SEO best practices.
  7. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  8. WHOIS data supports legitimacy and domain age is consistent with business claims.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with WooCommerce and Elementor, using modern web fonts and Font Awesome icons. Google Tag Manager is integrated for analytics and marketing tracking. The site uses a reputable hosting provider (likely Shockmedia) and has a well-structured HTML with SEO optimizations including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data. Performance is moderate with deferred and minified scripts. Mobile optimization is good, and accessibility features are basic but present. The technical stack is standard for small to medium e-commerce sites, with opportunities to improve security configurations and privacy disclosures.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with redprofs.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review redprofs.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.