Skip to main content

Security report for redorange.com

RedOrange · Government · United States

Critical risk. 12 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

15/100

Risk levelCritical

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

RedOrange is a small-sized, globally networked government contracting company specializing in procurement, base operating services, heavy equipment services, hospitality and events management, and global logistics. The company primarily serves federal government agencies and related organizations in the United States, United Kingdom, and European Union. Their business model focuses on providing tailor-made solutions through strategic partnerships and a global supply chain network. The website presents a professional image with detailed service descriptions and client testimonials, positioning RedOrange as a trusted partner in government contracting. Technically, the website uses modern web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Google Fonts, and Swiper.js for interactive sliders. The site is moderately optimized for mobile devices and performance, though accessibility and SEO optimizations are basic. The presence of Google Analytics indicates some level of user tracking, but no advanced privacy compliance mechanisms such as cookie consent banners or privacy policies are present. From a security perspective, the site lacks visible HTTPS enforcement in the provided URL, and no security headers are detected. The contact form uses POST but lacks CAPTCHA or anti-bot protections. These gaps present moderate security risks and compliance issues, especially regarding GDPR and data protection best practices. The absence of privacy and cookie policies further weakens privacy compliance. Overall, the website is functional and professional but requires improvements in security posture and privacy compliance to enhance trustworthiness and reduce risk. Strategic recommendations include implementing HTTPS, adding security headers, deploying privacy policies and cookie consent mechanisms, and enhancing form security.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

12 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: PostgreSQL

      Port 5432 (PostgreSQL) is publicly accessible - PostgreSQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to PostgreSQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  4. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching redorange.com

This scan found 19 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
50
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
10
Average
15

Not counted

  • DNS health: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

RedOrange operates in the government contracting sector with a focus on federal agencies and international government organizations. Their competitive advantages include over 15 years of experience, strategic supplier agreements, and a global network of supply chain teams. The business model is service-oriented, providing end-to-end procurement and logistics solutions. Revenue streams likely derive from government contracts and supply chain services. The target customers are government entities requiring procurement, logistics, and operational support. Growth indicators include a broad client base with testimonials from military and UN officials and multiple certifications. The partnership ecosystem includes manufacturers and logistics providers worldwide. The company maintains a flat organizational structure to remain agile and responsive to client needs.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is moderate to low. Key vulnerabilities include lack of HTTPS enforcement, absence of security headers, and no visible anti-bot measures on forms. These issues increase the risk of data interception, cross-site scripting, and spam or abuse via contact forms. Compliance gaps exist due to missing privacy and cookie policies, which are critical for GDPR and other data protection regulations. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are not evident from the website. The company should prioritize implementing HTTPS, security headers, and privacy compliance measures to mitigate risks and improve security posture.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate to secure all website traffic.
  2. Add essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Deploy a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to comply with GDPR and enhance user trust.
  4. Integrate CAPTCHA or other anti-bot protections on contact forms to prevent spam and abuse.
  5. Conduct regular security audits and update third-party libraries to mitigate vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Red Orange North America, inc.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
RedOrange
Description
RedOrange is a globally networked full-service government contractor providing tailor-made solutions according to clients’ needs, focusing on procurement, base operating services, heavy equipment services, hospitality and events management, and global logistics.
Key services
Procurement, Base Operating Services, Heavy Equipment Services, Hospitality & Events Management, Global Logistics & Service
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Google Fonts (Open Sans, Oswald), Swiper.js (slider), FontAwesome (icons)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
45/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS implied by URL (http://redorange.com provided, no https link in HTML)
  • Contact form uses POST method

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. No privacy policy or cookie policy found on the website
  2. No terms of service page detected
  3. Contact form collects name, email, and message without CAPTCHA
  4. No explicit email addresses or phone numbers found in the HTML content
  5. Multiple client logos and testimonials enhance trust
  6. Use of Google Analytics without visible cookie consent mechanism
  7. No structured data (JSON-LD or Open Graph) detected in the HTML
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using standard web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript, with external dependencies on Google Fonts and Swiper.js for UI components. The site loads with moderate performance and is optimized for mobile devices to a good extent. However, accessibility features are basic, and SEO optimizations are minimal, lacking structured data or Open Graph metadata. The absence of a CMS suggests a custom or static site architecture. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the HTML. Technical risks include missing HTTPS enforcement and lack of security headers, which could impact user trust and data security. Modernization opportunities include adding structured data, improving accessibility, and enhancing SEO for better visibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with redorange.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review redorange.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.