Skip to main content

Security report for redgalaxy.co.uk

RedGalaxy Ltd · Technology · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

RedGalaxy Ltd is a bespoke software development company based in Cambridgeshire, UK, specializing in custom CRM, booking, and data analysis software solutions designed to improve business efficiency and growth. Their services target businesses requiring tailored software to automate processes and integrate with existing payment and CRM systems. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image with clear service offerings but lacks comprehensive contact details and privacy-related policies. Technically, the site uses modern frontend technologies such as Tailwind CSS and Alpine.js but suffers from slow load times and lacks a valid SSL certificate, resulting in no HTTPS support. Security posture is weak due to missing HTTPS, absence of security headers, and no advanced security configurations. The site has SPF and DMARC DNS records configured correctly, indicating some email security awareness. Overall, the website is functional and informative but requires significant improvements in security and privacy compliance to enhance trust and protect users.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching redgalaxy.co.uk

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
50
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
40
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

RedGalaxy Ltd operates in the technology sector, focusing on bespoke software development for CRM, booking, and data analysis applications. Their business model centers on delivering tailored software solutions that integrate with client systems and automate workflows. The company targets small to medium-sized businesses in the UK, particularly those needing specialized software to optimize customer management and resource booking. The lack of extensive contact information and absence of social media presence may limit outreach and customer engagement. The company leverages Cloudflare for DNS and possibly hosting, indicating a reliance on established infrastructure providers. The website content is well-structured and relevant, supporting their market positioning as specialists in bespoke software. However, the absence of privacy and cookie policies and limited trust signals could impact credibility with privacy-conscious clients.

Security posture

The website's security posture is currently weak. The absence of a valid SSL certificate and HTTPS support is a critical vulnerability that exposes users to data interception risks. No security headers such as HSTS, Content-Security-Policy, or X-Frame-Options are implemented, increasing susceptibility to common web attacks. While SPF and DMARC DNS records are correctly configured, enhancing email security, there is no evidence of a security policy, incident response plan, or vulnerability disclosure mechanism on the site. The lack of a security.txt file and no dedicated security contact channels further reduce transparency and readiness for incident handling. These gaps present significant risks to both the company and its clients, especially given the nature of bespoke software development involving potentially sensitive client data.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and deploy a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire website immediately.
  2. Implement essential HTTP security headers including HSTS, Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and enhance user trust.
  4. Add a security.txt file and establish a clear vulnerability disclosure and incident response process with dedicated contact channels.
  5. Improve website performance by optimizing resources and reducing load times to enhance user experience and SEO.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses modern frontend technologies such as Tailwind CSS for styling and Alpine.js for interactivity, indicating a contemporary approach to UI development. DNS is managed via Cloudflare, providing potential for enhanced security and performance features, though these are not fully leveraged due to missing SSL configuration. The site lacks structured data markup and Open Graph metadata, limiting SEO and social media sharing effectiveness. Performance is suboptimal with a load time near 9 seconds, which could be improved by optimizing resource delivery and caching. Accessibility features are basic, and no CMS or backend platform is evident from the HTML content. Overall, the technical infrastructure is adequate for a small bespoke software provider but requires enhancements in security, SEO, and performance to meet modern standards.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with redgalaxy.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review redgalaxy.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.