Skip to main content

Security report for redbubble.com

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.redbubble.com is currently inaccessible due to a Cloudflare security challenge page requiring human verification via Turnstile captcha. This prevents access to any meaningful content, metadata, or business information. The WHOIS query for the domain returned no match, indicating either privacy protection, proxy registration, or a limitation in the WHOIS database access. Consequently, no registrar, creation, expiry, or registrant details could be extracted. The lack of accessible content and WHOIS data severely limits the ability to perform a comprehensive security, compliance, or business analysis. The site is known publicly as a global e-commerce marketplace for independent artists, but this analysis cannot confirm or deny that due to the blocked state.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Cloudflare

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching redbubble.com

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
65
Email security
95
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention redbubble.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
576,066
Employees
17
Customers
575,933
Third parties
116
Weak passwords
9%

Latest record dated 2026-06-12 · 168 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for redbubble.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –redbubble.com2026-06-12
  • –blog.redbubble.com2026-06-11
  • –www.redbubble.com2026-06-11
  • –blog.redbubble.com2026-06-09
  • –redbubble.com2026-06-09

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the blocked content and missing WHOIS data, no direct business intelligence could be gathered from the provided data. The domain is recognized as Redbubble, a marketplace for print-on-demand products, targeting artists and consumers globally. Without access to the site content or policies, no insights into market positioning, partnerships, or operational details are available.

Security posture

The security posture cannot be fully assessed because the site is behind a Cloudflare WAF challenge. While the presence of Cloudflare indicates some level of security infrastructure, no security headers, SSL details, or vulnerability information could be verified. The absence of accessible privacy, cookie, or incident response policies further limits compliance evaluation. The WHOIS data absence raises minor concerns but may be due to privacy protection.

Recommendations

  1. Allow access to website content for authorized security and compliance scanning to enable full analysis.
  2. Publish clear and accessible privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies to improve compliance posture.
  3. Expose contact and incident response information publicly to enhance trust and transparency.
  4. Ensure WHOIS data is available or provide verified domain registration information to improve legitimacy signals.
  5. Implement and document security headers and best practices to strengthen security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Cloudflare detected. Page is a Cloudflare security challenge with Turnstile captcha verifying human visitor before access. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Technology

Stack
Cloudflare Turnstile, JavaScript, HTML5, CSS3

Analytics and tracking

Site quality

Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is blocked behind a Cloudflare Turnstile challenge page.
  2. No actual website content, metadata, or structured data is accessible for analysis.
  3. No contact information, policies, or business details are extractable from the provided HTML.
  4. WHOIS data is unavailable or not found in the .com registry WHOIS database.
  5. Only external link found is to Cloudflare domain for security challenge.
  6. No forms or input fields visible except hidden Turnstile response input.
  7. No scripts or libraries beyond Cloudflare challenge script detected.
  8. No SEO or accessibility metadata present due to blocked content.
  9. Security headers and SSL configuration cannot be assessed from provided data.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses Cloudflare for security and performance, including the Turnstile captcha for bot mitigation. The HTML is minimal and only serves the challenge page. No CMS, frameworks, or analytics scripts are detectable. The hosting provider is Cloudflare. Due to the challenge page, performance, SEO, accessibility, and mobile optimization cannot be evaluated. The technical stack appears modern but inaccessible for deeper inspection.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with redbubble.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review redbubble.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.