Skip to main content

Security report for redblugraphics.co.uk

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.redblugraphics.co.uk is currently inaccessible, returning a 403 Forbidden error indicating that access is blocked by server permissions. The domain WHOIS lookup failed due to the domain name being invalid per Nominet UK rules, which state that the domain contains too many parts. No registrar, registrant, or domain status information is available. The lack of accessible content, metadata, or contact information prevents any meaningful business or technical analysis. The site appears misconfigured or the domain is not properly registered. From a technical perspective, no technologies, scripts, or frameworks could be detected due to the absence of content. The site lacks security headers and HTTPS enforcement cannot be confirmed, indicating a weak security posture. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies are present, and no contact or incident response information is available. Security posture is poor due to the site being inaccessible and the domain registration being invalid. The absence of WHOIS data and the 403 error significantly reduce trust and legitimacy. There are no indications of adult or unsafe content; the site is simply blocked. Overall, the website is not operational or accessible, and the domain registration status is questionable. Strategic recommendations include resolving domain registration issues, configuring proper server permissions to allow access, implementing HTTPS and security headers, and publishing standard compliance and contact information to improve trust and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching redblugraphics.co.uk

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the lack of accessible content and absence of WHOIS data, no business intelligence insights can be derived. The domain is invalid per registry rules, and no company information, market positioning, or services are identifiable. The website does not provide any business or operational data.

Security posture

The security posture is currently very weak. The site is inaccessible due to a 403 Forbidden error, indicating server-level access restrictions. No security headers or HTTPS enforcement are detected. The domain registration is invalid, which raises concerns about legitimacy and operational continuity. There is no evidence of compliance with GDPR or other security frameworks. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are absent. Overall, the site is not secure or trustworthy in its current state.

Recommendations

  1. Resolve domain registration issues with Nominet to ensure the domain is valid and properly registered.
  2. Configure web server permissions to allow legitimate access and avoid 403 Forbidden errors.
  3. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate and enforce secure connections.
  4. Add standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  5. Publish privacy policy, cookie policy, terms of service, and contact information to improve compliance and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

None detected. Website returns a 403 Forbidden error with no WAF challenge or security page detected. Access is blocked by server permissions. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Content quality
poor
Branding
inconsistent

Technology

Performance
slow
Mobile
poor
Accessibility
poor
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
10/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is inaccessible due to 403 Forbidden error.
  2. No content or metadata available for analysis.
  3. No WHOIS data available due to invalid domain name.
  4. No contact or policy information found.
  5. No security headers or HTTPS enforcement detected.
  6. No external links or social media references found.
  7. No scripts or technologies detected due to lack of content.
  8. Site likely misconfigured or domain invalid.
Technical notes

Notes

No technical infrastructure or technology stack could be identified due to the lack of accessible content. The site returns a 403 Forbidden error with minimal HTML, indicating server-side access restrictions. No CMS, scripts, or analytics tools are detectable. The domain is invalid per WHOIS lookup, suggesting registration or configuration issues. Performance, mobile optimization, SEO, and accessibility cannot be assessed and are presumed poor due to lack of content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with redblugraphics.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review redblugraphics.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.