Skip to main content

Security report for reclaim.ai

Reclaim.ai, Inc. · Technology · United States

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS.

Security score

85/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Reclaim.ai, Inc. operates reclaim.ai, a technology company specializing in AI-powered calendar productivity solutions. Their platform integrates with Google Calendar and Outlook Calendar to help teams and professionals optimize their schedules by auto-scheduling tasks, habits, meetings, and breaks. Positioned as a SaaS provider, Reclaim targets teams seeking to improve time management and work-life balance through intelligent automation. The website reflects a mature digital presence with professional design, clear navigation, and comprehensive content supporting their business model. Technically, the website is built on Webflow CMS and leverages modern web technologies including Google Tag Manager, HubSpot, Intellimize, and Osano for cookie consent management. Hosting and DNS are managed via Cloudflare, ensuring fast performance and security. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with good SEO practices evident in meta tags and structured navigation. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and employs clientTransferProhibited domain status to prevent unauthorized domain transfers. Cookie consent mechanisms comply with GDPR, and privacy policies are comprehensive. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and explicit security headers like X-Frame-Options are not visibly configured, representing areas for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Overall, reclaim.ai demonstrates a strong security posture and privacy compliance aligned with industry standards. The domain registration details corroborate the legitimacy of the business. The site’s content is safe for general audiences, with no adult or questionable material. Strategic recommendations include enabling DNSSEC, publishing a security.txt file, and enhancing security headers to further strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching reclaim.ai

This scan found 13 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
54
Security headers
85
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
100
Average
85

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention reclaim.ai, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for reclaim.ai right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Reclaim.ai holds a competitive position in the AI-driven productivity software market, offering a suite of intelligent scheduling and time management tools. Their SaaS business model includes free and paid subscription plans, targeting teams and professionals who require efficient calendar management. The company emphasizes integrations with popular platforms such as Slack, Asana, Jira, and Zoom, enhancing its ecosystem and appeal. Growth indicators include active marketing via HubSpot, affiliate programs, and a content-rich blog. The company’s US-based registration and domain age support a stable operational history. Their focus on AI and automation provides a competitive advantage in the productivity software sector.

Security posture

The security maturity of reclaim.ai is solid, with HTTPS enforced and domain transfer protections in place. The presence of a cookie consent banner and privacy policy indicates compliance with GDPR and related regulations. The use of third-party analytics and marketing tools is managed with user consent mechanisms. However, the absence of DNSSEC and explicit security headers like X-Frame-Options and Content-Security-Policy in the visible HTML suggests room for enhancement. No incident response contacts or security policies are published, which could improve transparency and readiness. Overall, the site maintains a good security posture with minor gaps that can be addressed to elevate trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the reclaim.ai domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish and enforce security headers such as X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Content-Security-Policy to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  3. Create and publish a security.txt file to provide a clear vulnerability disclosure channel.
  4. Develop and publish an incident response policy or contact information to enhance transparency and preparedness.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and libraries to ensure no vulnerable components are included.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Reclaim.ai, Inc.
Description
Reclaim is an AI-powered app that creates 40% more time for teams by auto-scheduling tasks, habits, meetings, and breaks. It integrates with Google Calendar and Outlook Calendar.
Key services
AI Focus Time, AI Scheduling Links, AI Buffer Time, AI Habits, AI Smart Meetings, AI Time Tracking, AI Tasks, AI Calendar Sync, AI Planner
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow, Google Tag Manager, HubSpot, Intellimize, Osano (cookie consent), Google Fonts, Slick Carousel
Frameworks
Webflow CMS
Platforms
Google Calendar, Outlook Calendar
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status
  • Cookie consent with opt-in/out
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, HubSpot Analytics, Intellimize
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
HubSpot Ads
Tracking pixels
HubSpot Analytics, Intellimize
Marketing tools
HubSpot, Intellimize
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Strong focus on AI-powered calendar productivity tools.
  3. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy policy in place.
  4. Multiple integrations with popular productivity platforms.
  5. No signs of malicious or suspicious content.
  6. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  7. Clear calls to action for demos, signups, and contact.
  8. No direct company emails or phone numbers publicly listed.
  9. WHOIS data supports legitimacy and business consistency.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Webflow CMS, leveraging modern front-end technologies and integrations with marketing and analytics platforms such as HubSpot, Google Tag Manager, and Intellimize. Hosting and DNS services are provided by Cloudflare, ensuring robust performance and security. The site is well-optimized for mobile devices and accessibility, with fast loading times and clean, valid HTML/CSS. The use of cookie consent management via Osano demonstrates attention to privacy compliance. Technical debt appears minimal, with opportunities to enhance security headers and DNS configurations. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and scalable online presence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 86/100 −2Low17 findingsView report
  2. 88/100 +6Low16 findingsView report
  3. 82/100Low18 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with reclaim.ai. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review reclaim.ai.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.