Skip to main content

Security report for rechargeapps.com

Recharge · E-commerce · N/a

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

79/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Recharge is a leading subscription management platform specializing in powering ecommerce businesses with subscription and recurring payment solutions. Established in 2007, the company serves over 20,000 brands, positioning itself as a market leader in the ecommerce subscription space. The website reflects a mature and professional business with a clear focus on subscription commerce and customer retention strategies. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with a modern tech stack including Google Tag Manager, HubSpot, and PartnerStack, hosted on reputable infrastructure with Google Cloud DNS. The site is well optimized for SEO, mobile responsiveness, and accessibility, demonstrating digital maturity. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced, security headers present, and URL parameter sanitization implemented. However, minor improvements such as enabling DNSSEC and publishing a formal security policy could enhance trust further. Privacy compliance is robust with comprehensive privacy and cookie policies and a consent mechanism in place. Overall, the site is trustworthy, professional, and secure, with no critical vulnerabilities detected.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rechargeapps.com

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
65
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
79

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention rechargeapps.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
8,374
Employees
2
Customers
8,330
Third parties
42
Weak passwords
10%

Latest record dated 2026-05-25 · 17 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for rechargeapps.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –admin.rechargeapps.com2026-05-25
  • –admin.rechargeapps.com2025-04-14

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Recharge operates in the ecommerce sector, providing subscription management and recurring payment services to a large client base of over 20,000 brands. Its business model is SaaS-based, targeting ecommerce merchants seeking to implement or optimize subscription offerings. The company leverages partnerships and affiliate programs such as PartnerStack to expand its ecosystem. The website content and structured data emphasize its leadership and extensive market reach. While no direct physical address or phone contact is publicly listed, the presence of a contact form and social media presence on LinkedIn supports business credibility. The company’s longevity and domain age align with its market position, indicating stability and trustworthiness.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and multiple security headers implemented. URL parameter sanitization is actively performed to prevent injection attacks. The use of a cookie consent banner aligns with privacy regulations such as GDPR. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of a published security policy, incident response contacts, or a vulnerability disclosure program represents an area for improvement. DNSSEC is not enabled, which could be considered a minor security gap. Overall, the security posture is strong but could benefit from enhanced transparency and formalized security documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and compliance.
  3. Add explicit security and abuse contact emails (e.g., security@, abuse@) to facilitate incident reporting.
  4. Implement and publish a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Regularly review third-party scripts and libraries to ensure no vulnerabilities are introduced.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Recharge
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Recharge
Description
The subscription management platform that powers the growth and retention strategies of more than 20,000 brands.
Key services
Subscription management, Recurring payments, Customer retention tools
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, HubSpot Analytics, PartnerStack, CookiePro, Hotjar, Yoast SEO, WP Rocket
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Sanitization of URL parameters
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM), HubSpot Analytics, Dreamdata, Hotjar
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Bing Ads, Google Ads, Reddit Ads
Tracking pixels
LinkedIn Insight, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar
Marketing tools
HubSpot Analytics, Dreamdata Analytics
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well maintained.
  2. Strong SEO and accessibility practices observed.
  3. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms.
  4. No direct company emails or phone numbers found in HTML; contact via form only.
  5. Extensive use of third-party analytics and marketing tools.
  6. No security.txt or explicit security policy found.
  7. No DNSSEC enabled, which is a minor security gap.
  8. No signs of WAF blocking or content restrictions.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern and well-structured front-end using multiple CSS chunks and JavaScript libraries. It integrates various marketing and analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager, HubSpot, Dreamdata, Hotjar, and PartnerStack. The site uses a CDN and preconnect hints to optimize loading performance. Mobile optimization is excellent with responsive images and adaptive styles. SEO is enhanced by Yoast SEO plugin and structured data in JSON-LD format. The site uses Google Cloud DNS and NameCheap as registrar, indicating reliable hosting and domain management. Performance is fast, and accessibility features are present, though some minor improvements could be made. Overall, the technical infrastructure is robust and supports the business needs effectively.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 74/100Medium26 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rechargeapps.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rechargeapps.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.