Skip to main content

Security report for recenze-hodnoceni.cz

Other · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Recenze-hodnoceni.cz is an independent Czech internet project specializing in user reviews and ratings primarily for electronics and consumer products. The platform allows users to write and read reviews to aid purchasing decisions. The website is built on WordPress using the Twenty Fifteen theme and incorporates standard web technologies such as jQuery and Google Fonts. The site demonstrates moderate technical maturity with good mobile optimization and SEO practices but lacks advanced security headers and privacy policies. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced but shows deprecated PHP function usage and absence of security headers, indicating room for improvement. No WHOIS data is available, suggesting privacy protection for domain registration, which is typical for small independent sites. Overall, the site is accessible, content-rich, and trustworthy for general audiences, but it lacks formal privacy and contact information, which impacts compliance and business credibility scores.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching recenze-hodnoceni.cz

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention recenze-hodnoceni.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for recenze-hodnoceni.cz right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website operates as a user-generated content platform focused on consumer electronics and related product reviews, targeting general consumers in the Czech Republic. It maintains a niche market position as an independent review site with a small business scale. Revenue streams likely include affiliate marketing and advertising, though no explicit ad networks or tracking tools were detected. The site partners with accommodation services such as megaubytko.cz, indicating some diversification. The business model relies on community engagement and content freshness, with regular updates and multiple product categories. Lack of visible company registration or contact details limits transparency but is common for small independent sites.

Security posture

The security maturity of recenze-hodnoceni.cz is moderate. HTTPS is properly implemented, ensuring encrypted communication. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. The presence of deprecated PHP functions suggests outdated backend code that could introduce vulnerabilities. No incident response or security policy information is provided, limiting preparedness for security events. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the site is functional and secure enough for general use but requires improvements to meet higher security and compliance standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to enhance GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add essential security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to improve protection against web attacks.
  3. Update backend code to remove deprecated PHP functions and ensure compatibility with current PHP versions.
  4. Provide clear contact information and establish an incident response channel for security issues.
  5. Consider adding analytics and tracking disclosures to improve transparency and privacy compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Recenze-hodnoceni.cz je nezávislý internetový projekt zaměřený na hodnocení a uživatelské recenze především elektroniky. Můžete zde hodnotit a psát vlastní recenze i číst hodnocení ostatních uživatelů a dobře se rozhodnout před vlastním nákupem.
Key services
user reviews, product ratings, consumer advice
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Google Fonts, PHP
Frameworks
WordPress Twenty Fifteen theme
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a Czech independent user review platform focused on electronics and consumer products.
  2. Content is rich with multiple categories and recent updates.
  3. No visible privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided.
  5. Uses WordPress CMS with standard plugins and themes.
  6. No security headers detected; deprecated PHP function warning present.
  7. No WHOIS data available, indicating privacy protection or data unavailability.
  8. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected; site fully accessible.
  9. External links include partner site megaubytko.cz and other unrelated domains.
  10. No analytics or tracking scripts explicitly detected in provided HTML.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is powered by WordPress CMS with the Twenty Fifteen theme and uses jQuery and Google Fonts for frontend functionality and styling. The HTML is well-structured with appropriate meta tags for SEO and Open Graph for social sharing. Performance is moderate with cached CSS and deferred JavaScript loading. Mobile optimization is good, and accessibility features are basic but present. However, the site shows deprecated PHP function warnings, indicating technical debt. No advanced frameworks or modern JavaScript libraries are detected. Hosting provider details are not available from the provided data. Overall, the technical infrastructure is stable but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with recenze-hodnoceni.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review recenze-hodnoceni.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.