Skip to main content

Security report for rebit.sk

REBIT · Telecommunications · Slovakia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

REBIT is a regional telecommunications provider based in Slovakia, specializing in high-speed optical and wireless internet services along with IPTV television packages. The company targets residential and business customers primarily in Banská Bystrica and surrounding localities. The website reflects a focused business model with clear service offerings and a professional presentation. Technically, the site uses modern frontend technologies such as Tailwind CSS, FontAwesome, and htmx, providing a responsive and accessible user experience. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and no visible sensitive data exposure, but lacks advanced security headers and published security policies. Privacy compliance is weak due to absence of privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the domain registration data supports the legitimacy of the business with consistent and transparent WHOIS information.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rebit.sk

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
30
Email security
90
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

REBIT operates as a small-sized ISP and IPTV provider with a regional market focus. Its competitive advantage lies in offering tailored internet speeds and TV packages adapted to local infrastructure and customer needs. The business model is subscription-based with options for optical and wireless connectivity. The partnership with BBXNET is evident from registrar and DNS data, suggesting a collaborative ecosystem. Growth potential exists in expanding optical network coverage and IPTV offerings. The company maintains direct customer contact channels but lacks visible certifications or trust badges on the website.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a baseline security posture with HTTPS enforced and no apparent exposure of sensitive information. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which limits transparency and preparedness perception. Forms appear to be standard without visible anti-CSRF tokens or advanced input validation indicators. No known vulnerable libraries detected in the frontend stack. Overall, security maturity is moderate but could be improved with policy publication and header implementation.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with GDPR compliance details.
  2. Implement and configure security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Add a security or incident response policy page and consider publishing a security.txt file for vulnerability disclosure.
  4. Enhance form security by adding anti-CSRF protections and input validation feedback.
  5. Consider integrating analytics with privacy-respecting configurations and provide transparency about data collection.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
REBIT
Description
REBIT provides high-speed internet and television services primarily in Banská Bystrica and surrounding localities in Slovakia.
Key services
Optical internet, Wireless internet, IPTV television packages
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Tailwind CSS, FontAwesome 5.15.4, htmx 1.9.8, hyperscript 0.9.12, SVG images
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of modern JS libraries

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Clear focus on regional internet and IPTV services.
  3. Contact information is prominently displayed.
  4. No privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  5. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  6. No analytics or tracking scripts detected in provided HTML.
  7. No signs of WAF or content blocking.
  8. Service enquiry form collects locality, technology, internet speed, TV package, and device options.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern frontend stack with Tailwind CSS for styling, FontAwesome for icons, and htmx/hyperscript for dynamic interactions, indicating a contemporary approach to web development. The site is mobile responsive and accessible with semantic HTML and ARIA attributes. Performance is moderate, with SVG images used for graphics and a clean layout. No CMS or backend platform is explicitly detected. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. There is an opportunity to improve SEO by adding structured data (JSON-LD) and enhancing meta tags. The site lacks analytics scripts, which may limit marketing insights but improves privacy.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rebit.sk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rebit.sk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.