Skip to main content

Security report for rebild.dk

Rebild Kommune · Government · Denmark

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Rebild Kommune operates an official municipal website providing citizens and stakeholders with comprehensive information about local government services, political agendas, and community offerings. The website is well-structured, targeting residents of Rebild Kommune and related business entities. It leverages Drupal 9 CMS and integrates modern frontend technologies and cookie compliance tools to ensure a user-friendly and privacy-conscious experience. The presence of a detailed cookie consent mechanism and a referenced Data Protection Officer indicates a strong commitment to GDPR compliance. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent implemented, though improvements in security headers and explicit security policies are recommended. Overall, the website is legitimate, professionally maintained, and trustworthy, reflecting the municipality's public service role.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rebild.dk

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
60
Email security
80
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website positions Rebild Kommune as a government entity serving a medium-sized population in Denmark. It offers a broad range of municipal services including citizen support, business facilitation, environmental management, and democratic engagement. The business model is public sector focused, with no commercial intent. The site’s navigation and content reflect a comprehensive approach to public communication and service delivery. The partnership with business.rebild.dk suggests an ecosystem supporting local economic development. The domain's long history and consistent WHOIS data reinforce the organization's stability and credibility.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a baseline security posture with HTTPS enabled and a robust cookie consent mechanism that categorizes cookies by purpose and provides users control over their data. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content Security Policy or X-Frame-Options indicates room for enhancement. No explicit incident response or security policy pages were found, which could be a gap in transparency and preparedness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. The site uses third-party services like Monsido and Google/Youtube for analytics and marketing, which are disclosed in the cookie policy, supporting privacy compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement standard security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options) to harden the site against common attacks.
  3. Publish explicit security and incident response policies to increase transparency and preparedness.
  4. Add a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and cookies for compliance and security risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Rebild Kommune
Description
Rebild Kommune's official website providing information about municipal services, citizen offers, political agendas, and local democracy.
Key services
Citizen services, Political information, Business services, Environmental and social services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Drupal 9, jQuery UI, Tiny Slider, FancyBox, Cookie Information consent management
Frameworks
Drupal
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Monsido
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google, Youtube
Tracking pixels
Monsido
Marketing tools
Cookie Information
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is an official municipal government portal for Rebild Kommune, Denmark.
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent banner with detailed cookie categories and privacy policy.
  3. No explicit terms of service or security policy pages found.
  4. Data Protection Officer contact is referenced in the menu structure.
  5. Uses Drupal 9 CMS with modern frontend libraries and cookie compliance tools.
  6. No WAF or blocking detected; site content fully accessible.
  7. WHOIS data confirms long-standing domain registration consistent with municipal entity.
  8. External links mostly to trusted domains related to cookie management, analytics, and government services.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Drupal 9, a modern and widely supported CMS, ensuring a solid technical foundation. It uses jQuery UI components, Tiny Slider for carousels, and FancyBox for media display, indicating a rich interactive user experience. The cookie consent is managed by Cookie Information, a specialized GDPR compliance tool. The site is mobile optimized and accessible, with proper meta tags and SEO considerations. Performance is moderate, likely influenced by the extensive use of CSS and JavaScript assets. No hosting provider details were identified from the content. Overall, the technical implementation is sound but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and performance optimizations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rebild.dk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rebild.dk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.