Skip to main content

Security report for realytics.net

Other · N/a

Partial score · DNS & email only

59/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website realytics.net is currently inaccessible, returning a 503 Service Unavailable error indicating no server is available to handle requests. Due to this, no content, metadata, or business information is available for analysis. The domain is registered since 2014 with GoDaddy.com and uses multiple DNS providers including AWS and Azure DNS, but DNSSEC is not enabled. The lack of accessible content and security features results in a low overall security and compliance posture. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies are present, and no contact information or social media links are found. The website's technical infrastructure cannot be fully assessed due to unavailability, but the domain registration appears consistent and legitimate. The security posture is weak with no HTTPS or security headers detected. Overall, the site presents a high risk due to unavailability and lack of transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching realytics.net

This scan found 11 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Email security
72
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
59

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Given the absence of accessible website content, no detailed business intelligence can be derived. The domain age suggests an established presence since 2014, but no information about market positioning, services, or partnerships is available. The domain uses reputable DNS providers, indicating some level of infrastructure investment. Without content or contact details, the business credibility and customer engagement cannot be evaluated.

Security posture

The security posture is poor due to the absence of HTTPS, security headers, and DNSSEC. The 503 error page indicates server unavailability rather than a security challenge, but the lack of basic security controls and policies is concerning. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available. The domain status flags provide some protection against unauthorized changes but do not compensate for the lack of website security features. Overall, the site is vulnerable to trust and compliance issues.

Recommendations

  1. Restore website availability to provide accessible content and services.
  2. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate to secure communications.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Enable DNSSEC to improve DNS security and integrity.
  5. Publish comprehensive privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies to improve compliance and transparency.
  6. Provide clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for customer and security incident reporting.
  7. Establish an incident response policy and vulnerability disclosure program to enhance security posture.
  8. Improve website design, navigation, and content quality once site is restored.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Generic detected. 503 Service Unavailable error page indicating no server available to handle request; no WAF challenge detected but content is blocked/unavailable. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Content quality
poor
Branding
inconsistent

Technology

Performance
slow
Mobile
poor
Accessibility
poor
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
20/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is currently inaccessible, returning a 503 Service Unavailable error.
  2. No metadata, scripts, or content beyond the error message is present.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  4. No contact information or social media links detected.
  5. No security headers or HTTPS information available from provided data.
  6. Domain is registered with GoDaddy since 2014 with multiple DNS providers (AWS and Azure DNS).
  7. DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a security improvement opportunity.
  8. Website content and technical implementation cannot be assessed due to unavailability.
  9. AI scoring is heavily penalized due to lack of accessible content and security features.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is currently non-functional, returning a 503 error with no content or metadata. DNS is managed via AWS and Azure DNS services, but DNSSEC is not enabled. No CMS or frameworks can be detected due to lack of content. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified but likely involves cloud infrastructure given DNS providers. Performance and accessibility cannot be assessed. The lack of HTTPS and security headers indicates technical debt and security risks. Restoration of service and implementation of modern web standards are critical.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with realytics.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review realytics.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.