Skip to main content

Security report for realytics.io

Realytics · Technology · N/a

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

81/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Realytics is a technology company specializing in TV analytics and total video measurement solutions designed to measure the advertising impact of cross-media TV campaigns. Positioned as a leading provider in this niche, Realytics targets advertisers, marketing professionals, and media agencies seeking data-driven insights to optimize their video advertising strategies. The website reflects a professional B2B SaaS business model with a focus on analytics services. Technically, the site is built on WordPress using modern themes and plugins such as Divi and Elementor, with integrated marketing and analytics tools including Google Analytics and LinkedIn Insight. The site demonstrates good SEO practices and mobile optimization, though some accessibility features could be enhanced. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, but could benefit from additional security headers and a formal vulnerability disclosure policy. Overall, the domain appears legitimate though WHOIS data is privacy protected, which is common for tech companies. No critical security issues or content safety concerns were identified.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching realytics.io

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
75
Email security
87
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
81

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention realytics.io, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
7
Employees
0
Customers
7
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
0%

2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for realytics.io.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Realytics operates in the technology sector, providing specialized analytics services for TV and video advertising. Its market positioning as a leader in TV analytics suggests competitive advantages in data integration and cross-media measurement. The business model is primarily B2B SaaS, targeting marketing and advertising professionals. The website content and social media presence indicate active engagement with the industry. Revenue streams likely derive from subscription-based analytics services. The absence of detailed contact information or extensive corporate disclosures suggests a small to medium-sized enterprise. The company maintains a clean digital footprint with no suspicious domains or partners detected. Strategic growth could focus on expanding service offerings and enhancing transparency through published policies and certifications.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and integrates cookie consent mechanisms, reflecting awareness of privacy and security best practices. However, explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options are not detected, representing an area for improvement. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were found in the analyzed content. The lack of a security.txt file or incident response contact information limits transparency and readiness for vulnerability reporting. Compliance with GDPR is implied through cookie consent but not explicitly documented. Overall, the security maturity is moderate, suitable for a small technology firm but with room for enhancement to meet higher compliance and security standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen defense against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve transparency and legal compliance.
  3. Add a security.txt file and vulnerability disclosure policy to facilitate responsible reporting and incident response.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve usability for all users and comply with accessibility standards.
  5. Regularly audit and update all WordPress plugins and themes to mitigate risks from outdated components.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Realytics
Description
Realytics measures the advertising impact of your cross-media TV campaigns with its TV analytics and Total Video measurement solutions.
Key services
TV analytics, Total Video measurement, Cross-media campaign impact analysis
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.3, Divi Theme, Elementor, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Cookiebot, Slider Revolution, Ajax Search Lite, Essential Grid, Monarch Social Sharing
Frameworks
Yoast SEO
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, LinkedIn Insight
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
LinkedIn Insight
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. Content is professional and relevant to TV analytics and video measurement
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found on homepage
  4. Cookie consent implemented with Cookiebot
  5. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages detected in provided content
  6. Uses modern WordPress plugins and themes with SEO optimization
  7. Social media presence includes Facebook, Twitter (X), and LinkedIn
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy found
  9. No explicit security or incident response contact information found
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using the Divi theme and Elementor page builder, supported by various plugins for SEO (Yoast), analytics (Google Analytics, LinkedIn Insight), marketing (Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot), and UI enhancements (Slider Revolution, Ajax Search Lite). The tech stack is modern and widely supported, facilitating ease of maintenance and scalability. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts and optimized images. Mobile optimization is good, ensuring accessibility across devices. However, some technical debt is indicated by missing explicit security headers and limited accessibility features. Opportunities exist to modernize security configurations and improve compliance documentation to reduce technical risks and enhance user trust.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with realytics.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review realytics.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.