Skip to main content

Security report for realdeepfakes.com

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

RealDeepfakes.com is a niche adult content platform specializing in hyper-realistic deepfake porn videos curated from top-rated creators. The website targets adult users interested in deepfake adult content and offers free access to a handpicked collection of videos. The domain is relatively new, registered in 2022, and hosted with Cloudflare DNS services, indicating a modern infrastructure. The site employs popular analytics tools such as Matomo and Google Tag Manager, alongside Formbricks for form handling, reflecting a moderate level of digital maturity. However, the absence of privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies, as well as lack of contact information, indicates gaps in compliance and transparency. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and domain transfer protection, but DNSSEC is not enabled, and security headers are not evident. Overall, the site is functional and professionally designed but lacks critical privacy and security disclosures, which may impact user trust and regulatory compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching realdeepfakes.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
55
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the adult entertainment sector with a focus on deepfake technology content. Its business model appears to be content hosting and streaming, likely monetized through ads or premium content not visible in the provided data. The target audience is adult consumers seeking realistic deepfake pornographic videos. The company is small and newly founded, with no visible parent or subsidiary companies. The lack of explicit business contact details and certifications limits the ability to verify legitimacy and market positioning. The use of multiple CDN domains, including some with less common TLDs, suggests an attempt to optimize content delivery but may raise suspicion without clear partner disclosures.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and has domain status set to clientTransferProhibited, which helps prevent unauthorized domain transfers. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a missed opportunity to enhance DNS security. No security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), X-Frame-Options, or HSTS were detected in the provided data, which are recommended best practices. The site lacks published security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms, indicating limited security transparency. The use of third-party analytics and form services introduces potential privacy risks if not properly managed. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved with better security headers, DNSSEC, and published policies.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to protect against DNS spoofing and improve domain security.
  2. Implement and configure security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  4. Provide clear contact information including security and abuse contacts to enhance transparency and trust.
  5. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Discover hyper-realistic deepfake porn videos from top-rated creators. ❤️ Enjoy a handpicked collection of the most convincing deepfake content, all available for free!
Key services
Hosting and streaming hyper-realistic deepfake porn videos, Content curation from top-rated creators
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Matomo Analytics, Formbricks, Cloudflare DNS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo, Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Marketing tools
Formbricks
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website offers adult deepfake pornographic content.
  2. No visible privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found in the HTML content.
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses found.
  4. Uses modern tracking and analytics tools but lacks transparency on privacy compliance.
  5. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  6. Domain is relatively new and registered via a known registrar.
  7. No WAF or blocking detected; site content fully accessible.
  8. Multiple external domains used for CDN and analytics.
  9. No visible social media or business contact links.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack with Google Tag Manager, Matomo analytics, and Formbricks for form management. Hosting is supported by Cloudflare DNS and multiple CDN domains to optimize content delivery. The HTML and CSS appear valid and the site is mobile responsive with good design quality. However, SEO optimization is basic with minimal meta tags beyond description and title. Accessibility features are basic but present. Performance is moderate, likely influenced by the use of multiple external resources. There is no detected CMS, suggesting a custom or static site architecture. Technical risks include lack of DNSSEC and missing security headers, which could expose the site to certain attacks or reduce user trust.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with realdeepfakes.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review realdeepfakes.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.