Skip to main content

Security report for reaktoropinii.pl

Accorp Sp. z o.o. · Other · Poland

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Reaktor Opinii is an established Polish online research panel operated by Accorp Sp. z o.o. and the Instytut Badań Pollster, a leading market research firm. The platform offers paid surveys and product evaluations to a large community, rewarding participants for their opinions. The website demonstrates a solid market position with a medium-sized operation focused on leveraging technology for research purposes. Technically, the site uses modern JavaScript libraries, integrates Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise for bot protection, and employs a Consent Management Platform to ensure GDPR compliance. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though some security headers could be improved. The domain registration data aligns well with the business history, enhancing trust. Overall, the site is professional, user-friendly, and compliant with privacy regulations.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
85/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching reaktoropinii.pl

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
85
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the market research sector, targeting Polish consumers interested in influencing products and services through surveys. Its competitive advantage lies in its long-standing presence since 2011, certification in CAWI research, and integration of modern technologies for data collection and user engagement. Revenue streams likely include business clients purchasing research data and advertising. The partnership with Pollster Institute strengthens credibility and operational capacity. The business model focuses on community engagement and data-driven insights, supported by a clear privacy framework and transparent user rewards. Growth indicators include a large registered user base and active survey invitations. The partnership ecosystem includes Pollster and Accorp, with digital marketing tools integrated for outreach and analytics.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and advanced bot protection via Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise. The use of a Consent Management Platform indicates strong GDPR compliance efforts. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy or HSTS is a minor gap. Incident response and security policy documents are not publicly available, which could be improved. The presence of a named Data Protection Officer with contact details is a positive indicator of data governance. Overall, the security measures are appropriate for the business type, with room for enhancement in header policies and formal incident response disclosures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including Content Security Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to strengthen defense-in-depth.
  2. Enable DNSSEC for the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  3. Publish a formal security policy and incident response contact information on the website to enhance transparency and preparedness.
  4. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking pixels to ensure compliance with privacy and security standards.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Accorp Sp. z o.o.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Accorp Sp. z o.o.
Description
Reaktor Opinii is an online research panel operated by Instytut Badań Pollster, offering paid surveys, product and advertisement evaluations, and rewards for participation. The company specializes in research using new technologies and has been active since 2011.
Key services
Paid online surveys, Product testing, Advertisement evaluation, Reward distribution
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.6.1, jQuery UI 1.13.2, Owl Carousel, Font Awesome 4.6.3, Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, TikTok Pixel
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise integration
  • Consent Management Platform for GDPR compliance
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure form submission with CSRF token not explicitly visible but likely handled

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, TikTok Analytics, Facebook Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
TikTok Pixel, Facebook Pixel
Tracking pixels
TikTok Pixel, Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
CMP from smart.idmnet.pl
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Strong GDPR compliance with CMP and clear privacy/cookie policies.
  3. Multiple tracking and advertising pixels used with user consent.
  4. Clear business identity and contact information provided.
  5. Use of modern JavaScript libraries and reCAPTCHA Enterprise for security.
  6. No explicit security headers detected in HTML content; recommend review.
  7. WHOIS data consistent with business claims and domain age.
  8. No visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript stack including jQuery, jQuery UI, Owl Carousel, and Font Awesome for UI components and interactivity. Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and TikTok Pixel are integrated for analytics and marketing. Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise is used for bot mitigation on forms. The site appears custom-built without a common CMS, indicating tailored development. Performance is moderate with asynchronous script loading and responsive design for mobile devices. Accessibility features are basic but present. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured navigation. Hosting provider details are not explicit but domain registrar is home.pl S.A. The site could benefit from enhanced security headers and performance optimizations to reduce technical debt and improve resilience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with reaktoropinii.pl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review reaktoropinii.pl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.