Skip to main content

Security report for rdvit.com

RDV Group Ltd · Technology · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

RDV Group Ltd is a small UK-based IT outsourcing company established in 2013, offering a range of services including IT outsourcing, consulting, software development, system administration, and graphic design. The company targets businesses seeking reliable IT support and development services, with a portfolio of over 128 projects and 38+ customers. Their website is built on WordPress with modern plugins and frameworks, providing a good user experience and mobile optimization. However, the site lacks explicit privacy and cookie policies, which impacts GDPR compliance. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but missing key security headers and incident response information. Overall, the domain registration and website content are consistent and legitimate, reflecting a trustworthy business presence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rdvit.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
20
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a reliable IT outsourcing partner with experience in multiple industries such as banking, e-commerce, and medical sectors. Their business model focuses on service delivery with a strong emphasis on customer satisfaction and long-term contracts. The presence of testimonials and a portfolio enhances credibility. The company uses Cloudflare DNS and GoDaddy registrar, indicating standard industry practices. Growth indicators include a diverse service offering and multi-language support. No suspicious domains or partners were identified, suggesting a focused and stable business ecosystem.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and domain registration protections such as clientDeleteProhibited status, which are positive security indicators. However, the absence of security headers like Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security reduces the overall security posture. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which is a gap in security readiness. The contact form uses Contact Form 7, a widely used plugin, but no explicit mention of secure data handling or encryption is found. The lack of privacy and cookie policies also poses compliance risks under GDPR and similar regulations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance website security.
  3. Establish an incident response page or contact channel to improve security transparency and readiness.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities and maintain security hygiene.
  5. Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to foster responsible security practices.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
RDV Group Ltd
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
RDV Group Ltd
Description
RDV Group Ltd is an IT outsourcing company providing services such as IT outsourcing, IT consulting, software development, system administration, graphic design, and bespoke IT solutions. They have experience working with multinational companies and various industries including banking, e-commerce, catering, tourism, entertainment, and medical sectors.
Key services
IT Outsourcing, IT Consulting, Software Development, System Administration, Graphic Design, Bespoke IT Solutions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 4.9.13, WPBakery Page Builder, jQuery, Bootstrap 3.3.7, Owl Carousel, Cloudflare DNS
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • ClientDeleteProhibited domain status
  • ClientRenewProhibited domain status
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status
  • ClientUpdateProhibited domain status

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Tidio chat
Marketing tools
Social Pug (social sharing plugin)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional IT outsourcing company site with multi-language support
  2. No explicit privacy or cookie policy found, which is a compliance gap
  3. Contact information is comprehensive and includes multiple channels
  4. Security headers are not evident, which could be improved
  5. Website uses standard WordPress plugins and technologies
  6. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected
  7. Domain registration is stable and consistent with business claims
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 4.9.13 with WPBakery Page Builder and Bootstrap 3.3.7, indicating a mature but somewhat dated technology stack. The site uses jQuery and Owl Carousel for UI components and Cloudflare for DNS services. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. Accessibility is basic and could be improved. The site includes social sharing tools and a live chat widget (Tidio). There is no evidence of advanced analytics or tracking beyond standard contact form data collection. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rdvit.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rdvit.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.