Skip to main content

Security report for rd-alliance.org

Research Data Alliance · Other · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Research Data Alliance (RDA) is a globally recognized non-profit organization dedicated to enabling open data sharing and collaboration across research communities. The website reflects a mature digital presence with comprehensive information about governance, membership, working groups, and events. The organization targets researchers, data professionals, and institutions involved in data sharing and standards development. The business model is centered on community-driven collaboration and dissemination of best practices and recommendations in data management. The website's content quality and navigation are good, supporting the organization's mission effectively. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with BuddyPress for community features, leveraging common web technologies such as jQuery and Font Awesome. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. The site uses New Relic and Google Analytics for monitoring and analytics, indicating a focus on performance and user behavior insights. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and includes standard security headers, reflecting good security hygiene. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. However, the absence of a visible cookie consent mechanism and explicit privacy policy links suggests room for improvement in privacy compliance. WHOIS data is unavailable, likely due to privacy protection, which is typical for organizations of this nature. Overall, the website presents a professional and trustworthy digital front for the Research Data Alliance, with strong business credibility and a solid technical foundation. Strategic recommendations include enhancing privacy compliance with clear cookie consent and privacy policy visibility, publishing security incident response information, and improving accessibility features to meet broader compliance standards.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rd-alliance.org

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
53
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

RDA occupies a niche in the research data sharing ecosystem, providing a platform for collaboration and standards development. Its competitive advantage lies in its global community and recognized outputs that influence data management practices. The business model is non-commercial, focusing on membership and community engagement rather than direct revenue. Target customers include academic researchers, data stewards, and funding bodies. Growth indicators include active working groups, plenary meetings, and strategic plans. The partnership ecosystem is broad but not explicitly detailed on the site. The organization's operations emphasize transparency and community governance, supporting its market position as a trusted facilitator in open data.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforcement and multiple security headers such as HSTS, CSP, and X-Frame-Options. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive information were found in the HTML content. However, the lack of explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates potential gaps in security transparency and readiness. Compliance with GDPR is implied but not explicitly documented on the site. The use of third-party analytics and monitoring tools is standard but requires clear privacy disclosures. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be enhanced by formalizing policies and improving user-facing security information.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a visible cookie consent banner to comply with privacy regulations.
  2. Publish a dedicated and easily accessible privacy policy and terms of service pages.
  3. Add explicit security incident response contact information and consider a vulnerability disclosure policy.
  4. Enhance website accessibility to meet WCAG standards for broader compliance.
  5. Regularly review third-party scripts and analytics for privacy and security compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Research Data Alliance
Description
Research Data Alliance is an organization focused on building the social and technical bridges to enable open sharing of data.
Key services
Facilitating working groups and interest groups, Publishing recommendations and outputs, Organizing plenary meetings and events, Membership services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, BuddyPress, jQuery, Font Awesome, New Relic Browser monitoring
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Security headers present
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, New Relic Browser
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
New Relic
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation
  2. Uses WordPress CMS with BuddyPress for community features
  3. No direct email or phone contacts found on homepage; contact via form
  4. No explicit cookie consent banner detected
  5. Good use of structured data and SEO metadata
  6. Security headers and HTTPS are properly configured
  7. No WHOIS data available, likely privacy protected
  8. No signs of adult or questionable content
  9. Uses analytics and monitoring tools like Google Analytics and New Relic
Technical notes

Notes

The website is powered by WordPress CMS with BuddyPress for social features, using standard web technologies including jQuery and Font Awesome. It integrates New Relic for performance monitoring and Google Analytics for user tracking. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and uses structured data (JSON-LD) for SEO enhancement. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization in loading speed. The technical stack is modern and well-maintained, but reliance on multiple third-party scripts requires ongoing security and privacy oversight. Opportunities exist to improve accessibility and privacy compliance through technical and content updates.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rd-alliance.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rd-alliance.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.