Skip to main content

Security report for rcstrasbourgalsace.fr

Racing Club de Strasbourg Alsace · Other · France

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Racing Club de Strasbourg Alsace official website serves as a comprehensive digital platform for fans, partners, and stakeholders of the professional football club. It provides detailed information about the club's teams, schedules, ticketing, merchandise, and corporate hospitality. The site demonstrates a strong market position within French professional football, leveraging digital channels to engage its audience effectively. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with a modern tech stack including jQuery, Font Awesome, and Google Analytics, ensuring a good user experience and SEO optimization. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, though some security headers could be improved and WordPress updated to the latest version. Privacy compliance is moderate, with cookie policies present but no explicit privacy or terms of service pages detected. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and safe for general audiences.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rcstrasbourgalsace.fr

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
55
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The club operates in the sports and entertainment sector, targeting football fans and corporate partners. Revenue streams likely include ticket sales, merchandise, sponsorships, and hospitality services. The website's integration with ticketing and merchandise subdomains indicates a well-structured ecosystem supporting fan engagement and monetization. The presence of esports content suggests diversification into emerging markets. Partnerships with brands like Adidas and Winamax highlight strong commercial relationships. The club's digital presence is consistent and professionally managed, supporting its medium-sized organizational scale within the sports industry.

Security posture

The website maintains a good security baseline with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms. Use of OAuth2 for user login adds secure authentication. However, the WordPress version is outdated, which may expose the site to known vulnerabilities if not patched. Security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options are not explicitly detected, representing an area for improvement. No sensitive data leakage or obvious vulnerabilities were found in the HTML content. Incident response and security policy information are not publicly available, which is common but could be enhanced for transparency. Overall, the site is secure but would benefit from routine updates and enhanced header policies.

Recommendations

  1. Update WordPress core and all plugins to the latest stable versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  2. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish clear privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve compliance and user trust.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet WCAG standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Consider publishing security policy and incident response contact information to demonstrate security maturity and transparency.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Racing Club de Strasbourg Alsace
Description
Site officiel du Racing Club de Strasbourg Alsace, fournissant des informations sur le club de football, ses équipes, actualités, billetterie, boutique, et événements.
Key services
Club information and news, Ticketing and match schedules, Merchandise sales, Hospitality and business club services, Youth academy information, Esports team information
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 5.7.14, jQuery 3.5.1, Font Awesome 6.4.2, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics (gtag.js), Axeptio (cookie consent), AdRotate plugin, Ajax Search Lite plugin, Cool Timeline Pro plugin, Advanced Responsive Video Embedder, Calendly widget
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of OAuth2 for user login

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
AdRotate
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel (conditional), Xandr (conditional)
Marketing tools
Calendly widget
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation
  2. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected
  3. Uses modern web technologies and standard plugins
  4. No explicit privacy policy page found but cookie consent is implemented
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on homepage
  6. Strong social media presence linked
  7. WHOIS data unavailable, likely due to privacy protection
  8. Good SEO and structured data implementation
  9. No adult or questionable content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 5.7.14 with a variety of plugins for timeline, video embedding, search, and advertising management. It uses jQuery 3.5.1 and Font Awesome 6.4.2 for UI components. Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics are integrated for marketing and analytics purposes. The site loads external resources from reputable CDNs and uses a cookie consent platform (Axeptio) for GDPR compliance. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. Hosting provider details are not explicitly found. The site structure is clear with multilingual support and well-organized navigation. Some technical debt is indicated by the outdated WordPress version and lack of advanced security headers.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rcstrasbourgalsace.fr. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rcstrasbourgalsace.fr.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.