Skip to main content

Security report for rcms.si

Razvojni center Murska Sobota · Government · Slovenia

Partial score · DNS & email only

58/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Razvojni center Murska Sobota is a regional development institution focused on fostering economic, social, and cultural growth in the Pomurje region of Slovenia. The organization provides project management, entrepreneurship support, and regional development services primarily targeting local businesses, entrepreneurs, and government stakeholders. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand presence with clear contact information and active engagement in regional projects and tenders. Technically, the site employs modern web technologies including jQuery, Slick Carousel, and accessibility tools, hosted by a reputable Slovenian provider. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforcement and cookie consent mechanisms, though formal security policies and incident response contacts are absent. Overall, the site is trustworthy, compliant with GDPR, and well-structured for its audience.

Scanned

3 of 7 checks could not complete. The site may be unreachable or blocking automated scans, so the results below cover only what could be checked. Try a rescan later.

NIS2 and GDPR posture

NIS2 outside view
Not assessed
GDPR outside view
Not assessed

Both readouts depend on the site's pages, which could not be loaded in this scan.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rcms.si

This scan found 15 issues across 4 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Email security
80
DNS health
70
Network security
20
Average
58

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • GDPR outside view: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention rcms.si, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
2
Employees
0
Customers
0
Third parties
2
Weak passwords
0%

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for rcms.si.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The center operates as a government/non-profit entity with a clear regional focus on Pomurje, Slovenia. Its business model revolves around supporting regional development through consultancy, project facilitation, and grant management. The organization maintains partnerships with local initiatives such as SPOT Pomurje and web development partners. The website content and structure indicate a stable, small-sized institution with a long-standing domain registration since 2009. The target audience includes local entrepreneurs, public institutions, and community stakeholders. The presence of multiple active tenders and projects suggests ongoing engagement and funding activity, positioning the center as a key regional player.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent implemented. No security headers were detected in the HTML content, and no explicit security or incident response policies are published. There is no evidence of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries. The use of third-party scripts like Google Tag Manager and UserWay accessibility widget is noted, which should be regularly audited. The absence of a vulnerability disclosure policy and security.txt file indicates room for improvement in transparency and incident handling readiness. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a public institution website but could benefit from formalized policies and enhanced header configurations.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a formal security policy and incident response plan on the website.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and libraries for security vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance transparency by providing dedicated security contact channels.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Razvojni center Murska Sobota
Description
Razvojni center Murska Sobota je regijska ustanova, katere namen je spodbujati skladen gospodarski, družbeni in kulturni razvoj v pomurski regiji ter njenem upravnem središču, Mestni občini Murska Sobota.
Key services
Project management, Entrepreneurship support, Regional development programs, Consulting and documentation preparation, Grant and tender application assistance
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, jQuery 3.1.1, Slick Carousel, Masonry.js, Google Tag Manager, UserWay Accessibility Widget
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Consent management for cookies
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No vulnerable libraries detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a regional development center for Murska Sobota, Slovenia.
  2. Content is in Slovenian with English language option available.
  3. Clear contact information with physical address, phone, and email.
  4. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant.
  5. No terms of service or explicit security policies found.
  6. Use of modern JavaScript libraries and accessibility widget.
  7. No signs of malicious or suspicious content.
  8. Social media presence limited to Facebook.
  9. Multiple active projects and tenders listed with future dates.
  10. Cookie consent mechanism implemented with clear user options.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern and maintainable technology stack including HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript with jQuery, and popular UI libraries like Slick Carousel and Masonry.js. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and marketing purposes, and UserWay widget enhances accessibility compliance. The site is hosted by NEOSERV.si, a Slovenian hosting provider, which aligns with the regional focus. Performance is moderate with responsive design and mobile optimization evident. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. The site lacks a detected CMS, suggesting a custom or static site architecture. Technical risks are minimal but could be reduced by updating jQuery to a more recent version and ensuring all scripts are up to date.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rcms.si. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rcms.si.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.