Skip to main content

Security report for rbl.ms

Telecommunications · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Email security, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

52/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website tds-link.com serves as a minimal landing page primarily focused on telecommunications-related keywords such as Fiber Internet Service and Business Internet Plans. It appears to be a gateway or redirect page with embedded Google advertising content rather than a fully developed business site. The domain is registered with Dynadot Inc since 2019 and is currently active without privacy protection, indicating transparency in registration but limited business identity on the site itself. Technical infrastructure is basic, relying on standard HTML, CSS, and JavaScript with no detected CMS or advanced frameworks. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic, and SEO practices are minimal. Security posture is weak, with no security headers or cookie consent mechanisms detected, and DNSSEC is not enabled. The site uses Google advertising and tracking scripts but lacks privacy compliance features such as cookie banners or GDPR indicators. Overall, the site presents a low trust profile due to minimal content and lack of business contact information.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of rbl.ms. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  4. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rbl.ms

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
25
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
52

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The domain targets telecommunications-related services but does not provide detailed business information, contact details, or corporate identity on the site. The business model appears to be affiliate or advertising-driven, leveraging Google ad networks. There is no evidence of direct service offerings or customer engagement mechanisms. The site’s market positioning is unclear, and no partnerships or subsidiaries are disclosed. The domain age and registration are consistent with a legitimate entity, but the lack of transparency on the website limits business credibility. Growth indicators and strategic partnerships are not evident from the content.

Security posture

Security maturity is low, with no visible security headers, no HTTPS enforcement details provided, and no incident response or security policy information. The absence of cookie consent and GDPR compliance indicators suggests potential compliance gaps. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content, but the lack of security best practices reduces the overall security score. The site would benefit from implementing standard security headers, enabling DNSSEC, and providing clear security and privacy policies. Incident response readiness and contact channels are not present, indicating limited security culture and preparedness.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to enhance domain security and prevent DNS spoofing.
  2. Implement standard HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Add a cookie consent banner and update privacy policy to reflect GDPR compliance.
  4. Provide clear business contact information and security incident response contacts on the website.
  5. Improve website content quality and transparency to enhance trust and credibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
The website appears to be a landing or redirect page related to telecommunications services, referencing terms such as Fiber Internet Service, Business Internet Plans, and TDS Telecom Careers. No detailed business description is provided on the page.
Key services
Fiber Internet Service, Business Internet Plans, TDS Telecom Careers
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
Google AdSense, Google Ad Services
Tracking pixels
Google Ad Services cookie.js
Marketing tools
Google Ads
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is a minimal landing page with embedded ads and related search iframe.
  2. No visible contact information or business details on the main page.
  3. Privacy policy is present but basic; no cookie consent mechanism detected.
  4. No security headers or advanced security measures detected.
  5. WHOIS data is transparent and consistent but lacks registrant organization details.
  6. No forms or data collection fields present on the page.
  7. Advertising is primarily via Google AdSense and related Google ad services.
  8. No social media links or company contact emails/phone numbers found.
  9. No structured data (JSON-LD, Open Graph) metadata present.
  10. No terms of service or security policy pages detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses basic web technologies (HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript) without any detected CMS or advanced frameworks. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified beyond the registrar information. Performance is moderate with no visible errors or broken elements, but mobile optimization and accessibility are basic. SEO optimization is minimal, with no meta description or structured data present. Advertising scripts from Google are embedded, indicating monetization through ads. The site lacks modern technical features such as progressive web app capabilities or advanced analytics. Technical debt appears low but modernization opportunities exist to improve user experience and security.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 62/100Medium33 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rbl.ms. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rbl.ms.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.