Skip to main content

Security report for razorpay.com

Razorpay · Finance · India

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

77/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Razorpay is a well-established fintech company founded in 2013, providing comprehensive payment solutions primarily targeting businesses and merchants in India. The company offers a suite of payment services including payment gateways, payment links, and support for various payment methods such as UPI, credit/debit cards, and netbanking. The website reflects a mature business with consistent branding and professional content tailored to its target audience. Technically, the site leverages modern JavaScript frameworks and analytics tools such as Segment, Amplitude, and Google Analytics, hosted on AWS infrastructure, indicating a robust digital maturity. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS and uses Sentry for error tracking, but lacks visible security headers and published security policies, which are areas for improvement. Overall, the website is accessible, well-designed, and trustworthy, though it would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security transparency.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of razorpay.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching razorpay.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
65
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
77

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Razorpay holds a strong market position as a leading payment solution provider in India, serving a large customer base of businesses requiring online payment processing. Its business model revolves around fintech services, generating revenue through transaction fees and value-added payment services. The company demonstrates growth potential through its extensive use of analytics and marketing tools, indicating active customer engagement and data-driven decision-making. The absence of explicit contact information on the website suggests a focus on digital self-service and possibly enterprise client onboarding. The domain age and registration details support the legitimacy and stability of the business. No suspicious or privacy-protected WHOIS data is present, reinforcing trustworthiness.

Security posture

The website exhibits a moderate to good security posture with mandatory HTTPS enabled and domain transfer protections in place. Use of Sentry for error monitoring and analytics plugins indicates proactive operational monitoring. However, the lack of DNSSEC and absence of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security robustness. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is publicly available, which could hinder transparency and trust in security incident handling. The extensive use of third-party tracking and advertising scripts increases the attack surface and privacy risks, necessitating careful management and compliance adherence.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear consent mechanisms to improve GDPR and privacy compliance.
  3. Add standard security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) to strengthen web security posture.
  4. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible security reporting.
  5. Provide clear contact information for security incidents and data protection officer to improve incident response readiness and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Razorpay
Description
Online Payments India: Start Accepting Payments Instantly with Razorpay's Payment Suite, which Supports Netbanking, Credit Card & Debit Cards, UPI etc.
Key services
Payment gateway, Payment links, UPI payments, Credit and debit card processing, Netbanking payments
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Segment Analytics, Amplitude, Criteo, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Facebook Pixel, Sentry, Microsoft Clarity, Google Analytics, Framer (for site design)
Frameworks
Framer
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Client transfer prohibited domain status
  • Use of Sentry for error tracking

Analytics and tracking

Services
Segment, Amplitude, Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Sentry
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Criteo
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Microsoft Clarity, Amplitude
Marketing tools
Segment Analytics, Amplitude
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses modern analytics and tracking tools extensively
  2. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found in provided content
  3. No visible contact emails or phone numbers in the HTML content
  4. Website is professionally designed with good branding consistency
  5. Security headers not explicitly detected in provided data
  6. Domain is well aged and registered with a reputable registrar
  7. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Framer for design and heavily integrates modern analytics and marketing technologies including Segment, Amplitude, Criteo, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Microsoft Clarity, and Google Analytics. Hosting is on AWS infrastructure as indicated by DNS servers. The site uses asynchronous and deferred loading of scripts to optimize performance, though overall loading speed is moderate. Mobile optimization is good, and SEO meta tags are well implemented. Accessibility features are basic but present. The technical stack is modern and scalable but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and privacy-focused improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 77/100Low25 findingsView report
  2. 75/100Medium5 findings · partial scanView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with razorpay.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review razorpay.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.