Skip to main content

Security report for razorpay.com

Razorpay · Finance · India

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

77/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Razorpay is a well-established fintech company founded in 2013, providing comprehensive online payment solutions primarily targeting businesses and merchants in India. The company offers a suite of payment services including payment gateways, UPI, netbanking, and card processing, positioning itself as a leading payment solution provider in the Indian market. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with good content quality and user experience, optimized for mobile devices. Technically, the site leverages modern analytics and tracking technologies such as Segment, Amplitude, Google Analytics, and Microsoft Clarity, hosted on AWS infrastructure with a CMS built on Framer. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and use of security monitoring tools like Sentry, though DNSSEC is not enabled and explicit security policies are not published. Privacy compliance is weak due to absence of visible privacy and cookie policies or consent mechanisms. Overall, the domain registration data is consistent and supports the legitimacy of the business.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching razorpay.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
65
Email security
77
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
77

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Razorpay operates in the finance and technology sectors, focusing on payment processing services for Indian businesses. Its business model revolves around providing a payment gateway and related financial services, generating revenue through transaction fees and value-added services. The company targets SMEs, startups, and enterprises requiring seamless online payment acceptance. The website's use of multiple analytics and marketing tools indicates a mature digital marketing strategy. The absence of explicit contact information and policy documents on the main page suggests these may be located on other pages or require further exploration. The domain's age and registrar information align with the company's founding timeline, reinforcing credibility. No suspicious or unrelated domains were found linked, indicating a focused partner ecosystem.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security foundation with HTTPS enforced and clientTransferProhibited domain status to prevent unauthorized transfers. Use of Sentry for error tracking and multiple analytics platforms shows active monitoring of site health and user interactions. However, the lack of DNSSEC implementation is a security gap that could expose DNS spoofing risks. No explicit security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure programs are visible, which are important for transparency and compliance. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. The security score is good but could be improved by publishing security-related documentation and enabling DNSSEC.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  3. Implement and display a cookie consent mechanism to comply with privacy regulations.
  4. Provide explicit security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  5. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Razorpay
Description
Online Payments India: Start Accepting Payments Instantly with Razorpay's Payment Suite, which Supports Netbanking, Credit Card & Debit Cards, UPI etc.
Key services
Payment gateway, Payment links, UPI payments, Netbanking, Credit and debit card processing
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Segment Analytics, Amplitude, Criteo, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Facebook Pixel, Microsoft Clarity, Sentry
Frameworks
Framer (for site generation/design)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Sentry for error monitoring
  • Use of clientTransferProhibited domain status
  • No DNSSEC enabled (area for improvement)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Segment, Amplitude, Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Sentry
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
Criteo
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Microsoft Clarity
Marketing tools
Segment Analytics, Amplitude
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses modern analytics and tracking tools extensively
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found in provided HTML
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML content provided
  4. Site is professionally designed and mobile optimized
  5. Security best practices partially implemented; DNSSEC missing
  6. No visible vulnerability disclosure or security.txt
  7. WHOIS data supports legitimacy and domain ownership stability
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web technologies including JavaScript frameworks and analytics tools such as Segment, Amplitude, and Google Analytics. It uses Framer as the CMS and design platform, hosted on AWS infrastructure as inferred from DNS servers. The site loads multiple asynchronous scripts for tracking and marketing, which may impact performance but are common in enterprise-grade sites. Accessibility features appear basic but functional. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. The site is mobile optimized and has a professional design. Technical risks include the absence of DNSSEC and potential privacy compliance gaps due to missing policy disclosures.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 77/100Low26 findingsView report
  2. 75/100Medium5 findings · partial scanView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with razorpay.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review razorpay.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.