Skip to main content

Security report for ravelry.com

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Ravelry is a community-driven platform focused on knitters, crocheters, and fiber artists, providing a comprehensive organizational tool and a yarn and pattern database. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image with a clear focus on its niche audience. The login page includes standard security features such as CSRF tokens and password reveal toggles, indicating attention to user security during authentication. However, the absence of WHOIS data limits the ability to fully verify domain legitimacy and ownership details. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies including HTML5, CSS, JavaScript, and video formats (WebM and MP4) for dynamic splash content. The site is mobile-optimized and includes privacy-focused analytics via plausible.io, reflecting a moderate level of digital maturity. SEO and accessibility are basic to good, but there is room for improvement in security headers and explicit privacy compliance disclosures. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS (implied by canonical URL), uses authenticity tokens in forms, and avoids exposing sensitive data in the HTML. However, no explicit security headers were detected, and privacy and cookie policies are missing from the analyzed content, which could impact compliance with GDPR and other regulations. No contact or incident response information is provided, limiting transparency. Overall, the website is safe, professional, and functional for its intended audience but lacks comprehensive privacy and security disclosures. The domain's WHOIS data absence is a concern for trust but may be due to privacy protection or recent registration. Strategic improvements in privacy policy visibility, security headers, and contact transparency would enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ravelry.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
60
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention ravelry.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
38,575
Employees
0
Customers
38,529
Third parties
46
Weak passwords
15%

24 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for ravelry.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Ravelry operates as a specialized community platform serving fiber arts enthusiasts, leveraging a niche market with a dedicated user base. Its business model centers on providing free access to organizational tools and a rich database of yarns and patterns, likely monetized through ancillary services or partnerships not visible in the login page content. The platform's market position is that of a trusted community hub within the crafting sector. The use of privacy-focused analytics suggests a commitment to user privacy, aligning with community values. The absence of explicit business contact information or corporate details on the login page limits external validation but is consistent with community-oriented platforms that prioritize user experience over overt commercial presence.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with standard protections such as CSRF tokens and secure password input fields. The use of HTTPS is implied but not explicitly confirmed in the data. The lack of visible security headers (e.g., Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options) and absence of privacy and cookie policies indicate gaps in security best practices and regulatory compliance. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The absence of incident response contacts or security policies reduces transparency and preparedness perception. Overall, the security posture is functional but could be significantly improved by implementing comprehensive security headers, explicit privacy disclosures, and incident response information.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Provide clear contact information including security incident response channels to enhance transparency and readiness.
  4. Verify and publish WHOIS domain registration details or ensure privacy protection is justified and clearly communicated.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct regular security audits to maintain and improve security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Ravelry is a community site, an organizational tool, and a yarn & pattern database for knitters and crocheters.
Key services
Community site, Organizational tool, Yarn & pattern database
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, HTML5, CSS, WebM video, MP4 video
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of authenticity token in form
  • Password input with reveal toggle

Analytics and tracking

Services
plausible.io
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
plausible.io
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.
  2. No WHOIS data available, limiting domain trust analysis.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the login page HTML.
  4. No contact emails, phone numbers, or addresses found in the provided HTML.
  5. Site uses plausible.io for privacy-focused analytics.
  6. Site includes a login form with CSRF protection token and password reveal toggle.
  7. No explicit security headers or SSL configuration details provided in data.
  8. Content is safe and targeted at general audience interested in knitting and fiber arts.
  9. No social media links or business contact information found in the HTML.
  10. Site branding is consistent and professional with multiple favicon sizes and splash videos.
Technical notes

Notes

The website employs a modern front-end technology stack with HTML5, CSS, and JavaScript, including video elements for dynamic splash content. It uses plausible.io for privacy-conscious analytics, avoiding more invasive tracking technologies. The site is mobile-optimized and includes multiple favicon sizes for device compatibility. However, no CMS or backend technologies are identifiable from the provided data. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous script loading and minimal blocking resources. The lack of detected security headers and explicit SSL configuration details suggests potential technical debt in security infrastructure. Opportunities exist to improve SEO, accessibility, and security implementations to reduce risk and enhance user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ravelry.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ravelry.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.