The website ravagegames.com is currently inaccessible, returning a 403 Forbidden error page which blocks all content. Due to this, no meaningful business, security, or compliance information can be extracted from the site itself. The domain is registered since 2015 with Hetzner Online GmbH and uses Cloudflare DNS services, indicating a legitimate registration but no active or accessible web presence. The lack of accessible content prevents assessment of the company's services, policies, or technical infrastructure. Security posture is minimal with no security headers or advanced configurations detected, and no privacy or cookie policies are present. Overall, the site appears inactive or restricted, resulting in a low trust and quality score.
Scanned ·
NIS2 and GDPR posture
GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
a(a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
b(b) Incident handling: One indicator
c(c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
d(d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
e(e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
f(f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
g(g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
h(h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
i(i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
j(j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
Partly checked
One indicator
Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
Security headers
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
High
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
Forces HTTPS connections
What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"
This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended
€25per month
TLS certificates and expiry
DNS records
SPF, DKIM and DMARC
Security headers
GDPR and NIS2 posture
Exposed services
Third-party trackers
Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
55
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
55
Not counted
NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
The certificate is not trusted by browsers
The website is not served over HTTPS
A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
The page loads a script from a compromised source
The domain registration has expired
SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Critical0–25
High26–49
Medium50–75
Low76–100
Breach exposure
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Dark web exposure
Add-on
Leaked records that mention ravagegames.com, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for ravagegames.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
No business intelligence data could be gathered from the website due to the access restriction. The domain age suggests the business may have been established in 2015, but no information on market positioning, services, or partnerships is available. No contact details or social media presence was found to support further business analysis.
Security posture
The security posture is weak as the site lacks security headers and DNSSEC is not enabled. The site uses HTTPS but no additional security best practices are observed. The 403 Forbidden response may indicate server-level access restrictions but does not provide insight into incident response readiness or vulnerability management. No security or incident response policies are published.
Recommendations
Restore website accessibility to allow content and policy review.
Implement and publish privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance.
Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security.
Enable DNSSEC for domain to improve DNS security.
Publish contact information and business details to improve trust and credibility.
Site observations
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Generic detected. Website returns a 403 Forbidden error page indicating access is blocked by server permissions. No specific WAF challenge detected but content is inaccessible. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.
Business
Content quality
poor
Technology
Security
Observed score
30/100
Analytics and tracking
Site quality
Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low
Key observations
Website content is completely blocked with a 403 Forbidden error.
No metadata, scripts, forms, or external links found due to blocked content.
No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies detected.
No contact information or social media links available.
Domain is registered and active but website is inaccessible.
No security headers or advanced security configurations detected.
No analytics or advertising technologies detected.
Content safety is rated safe due to lack of content.
Overall website quality and professionalism are poor due to lack of accessible content.
Technical notes
Notes
The website is hosted on Hetzner Online GmbH infrastructure with Cloudflare DNS. The site currently returns a 403 Forbidden error with minimal HTML content and no metadata, scripts, or forms. No CMS or frameworks are detectable. DNSSEC is not enabled. The lack of accessible content prevents evaluation of performance, SEO, or mobile optimization. The technical setup appears basic and incomplete.
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with ravagegames.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ravagegames.com.