Skip to main content

Security report for ru.ratless.lv

SIA Ratless · Other · Latvia

Medium risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SIA Ratless is a Latvian small business specializing in pest control services including deratization, disinsection, and disinfection. The company targets local businesses and property owners, positioning itself as a reliable partner in maintaining sanitary conditions. The website reflects a basic but functional digital presence with clear contact information and service descriptions. Technical infrastructure relies on standard web technologies such as jQuery and Google Analytics, with moderate performance and basic mobile optimization. Security posture is limited by the absence of visible security headers and unknown SSL configuration, while privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the site is accessible and safe, but improvements in security and compliance are recommended to enhance trust and professionalism.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ru.ratless.lv

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in a niche local market providing essential pest control services. Its business model is service-oriented with direct customer engagement via phone and email. The website content and social media presence indicate a modest but consistent branding effort. Lack of detailed WHOIS data limits external verification of legitimacy, but the business appears established since at least 2014. No partnerships or subsidiaries are evident from the data. Revenue streams likely derive from contracted pest control services. Growth potential may be enhanced by improving digital marketing and compliance transparency.

Security posture

The website currently lacks several key security best practices, including security headers and visible HTTPS enforcement confirmation. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which limits preparedness for security events. The use of Google Analytics introduces moderate user tracking without clear cookie consent mechanisms, raising privacy concerns. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerabilities were detected in the HTML content. Overall security maturity is low to moderate, suitable for a small business but requiring enhancements to meet higher compliance standards such as GDPR.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and verify configuration.
  2. Add standard security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options).
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance details.
  4. Introduce a cookie consent mechanism to inform users about tracking.
  5. Provide contact information for security incidents and vulnerability disclosures.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA Ratless
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA Ratless
Description
SIA Ratless is a specialized company providing preventive deratization, disinsection, and disinfection services in urban and rural areas.
Key services
Deratization, Disinsection, Disinfection
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Google Analytics, CSS3, HTML5
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error, limiting domain registration insights.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the website.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided including email, phone, and physical address.
  5. Website uses Google Analytics for tracking but lacks cookie consent mechanisms.
  6. No security headers detected in the provided data; HTTPS status unknown.
  7. Website content is business-focused and safe for general audiences.
  8. Social media presence limited to Facebook.
  9. Technical stack is basic with jQuery and standard web technologies.
  10. No forms detected in the HTML content provided.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a traditional HTML5 and CSS3 structure with jQuery for interactivity and Google Fonts for typography. Google Analytics is integrated for visitor tracking. The site lacks a detected CMS, suggesting a custom or static site build. Performance is moderate with no evident heavy scripts or media. Mobile optimization is basic but functional. Accessibility features are minimal. SEO is basic with meta viewport and some meta tags but no structured data or Open Graph tags detected. The site could benefit from modernization and improved technical SEO and accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ru.ratless.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ru.ratless.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.