Skip to main content

Security report for rat-marktforschung.de

Rat der Deutschen Markt- und Sozialforschung · Other · Germany

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Rat der Deutschen Markt- und Sozialforschung e.V. is an independent self-regulatory institution in Germany focused on ensuring adherence to professional principles and codes of conduct in market and social research. It serves as a complaint body for various stakeholders including respondents, clients, and competitors, promoting integrity and quality in the industry. The organization has a clear market position as a trusted regulator within the German research community. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with the Avada theme and uses caching plugins to optimize performance. It is hosted likely by Deutsche Telekom-related infrastructure, ensuring reliable service. The site is mobile-optimized and includes modern SEO practices such as Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data, although some accessibility features could be improved. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and avoids exposing sensitive data. However, it lacks some security headers and does not provide explicit incident response or security policies. Privacy compliance is partially addressed with a privacy policy present, but no cookie consent mechanism was detected. Contact information is primarily via a web form, with no direct emails or phone numbers publicly listed. Overall, the website presents a professional and trustworthy front for the organization, with good content quality and business credibility. Strategic improvements in security headers, privacy consent, and contact transparency would enhance its security posture and compliance standing.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rat-marktforschung.de

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
55
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
28
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention rat-marktforschung.de, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for rat-marktforschung.de right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization operates as a niche regulatory body within the market and social research sector in Germany. Its business model centers on self-regulation, complaint adjudication, and enforcement of industry standards. The target audience includes research participants, commissioning clients, and industry competitors. The website content and news updates indicate active engagement in complaint handling and public sanctioning, which supports its authority and trustworthiness. The presence on LinkedIn suggests some level of professional networking and outreach. The organization appears small but focused, with no indication of subsidiaries or parent companies. Its revenue streams likely derive from membership fees or industry contributions, typical for non-profit regulatory bodies.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and no visible sensitive data leaks. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces its defense-in-depth. No incident response contacts or security policies are published, which may hinder rapid response to security incidents. The lack of cookie consent mechanisms could pose GDPR compliance risks. No known vulnerabilities or outdated libraries were detected in the provided content. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could benefit from enhancements in headers, transparency, and privacy controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to improve protection against common web attacks.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner or mechanism to ensure GDPR compliance and inform users about data collection.
  3. Publish explicit incident response and security policies with dedicated contact channels to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Provide direct contact information such as official emails and phone numbers to enhance trust and user support.
  5. Regularly audit and update all plugins and themes to minimize vulnerabilities and maintain performance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Rat der Deutschen Markt- und Sozialforschung
Description
Der Rat sorgt für die Einhaltung der Berufsgrundsätze und Standesregeln in der Marktforschung und Sozialforschung. Er kann prüfen, ob ein begründeter Verstoß gegen diese Regeln vorliegt.
Key services
Prüfung von Beschwerden, Sanktionierung von Verstößen, Förderung von Redlichkeit und Qualität in der Branche
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.2, LayerSlider 7.15.1, Avada Theme, Breeze Cache Plugin
Frameworks
Avada
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with POST method

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is focused on self-regulation and complaint handling in market and social research in Germany.
  3. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the homepage; contact is via a form.
  4. No cookie consent banner detected despite GDPR relevance.
  5. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  6. Uses modern WordPress CMS with Avada theme and caching plugin for performance.
  7. Social media presence limited to LinkedIn link.
  8. No advertising or tracking scripts detected.
  9. Good SEO and metadata usage including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using the Avada theme and LayerSlider plugin, supported by Breeze caching for performance optimization. The hosting environment is likely provided by Deutsche Telekom-related infrastructure, which suggests reliable uptime and network quality. The site is responsive and mobile-friendly, with good SEO metadata including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data. However, accessibility features are basic and could be improved. Performance is moderate, with many minified JS scripts loaded. There is no evidence of heavy third-party tracking or advertising scripts, which benefits privacy and speed. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could be enhanced with better security headers and privacy tools.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rat-marktforschung.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rat-marktforschung.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.