Skip to main content

Security report for rapid-psary.cz

SK Rapid Psáry · Other · Czech Republic

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

47/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SK Rapid Psáry is a local Czech football club with a long tradition dating back to 1931. The website serves as an information hub for club members, fans, and the local community, providing news, match schedules, team information, and an e-shop for merchandise. The club targets football enthusiasts and community members interested in local sports activities. The business model is typical for a community sports club, focusing on engagement, membership, and local sponsorships. Technically, the website is built on a modern stack using EOS CMS, Alpine.js, Swiper.js, and other JavaScript libraries loaded from reputable CDNs. The site is mobile-optimized with good navigation and content structure, though some accessibility features could be improved. Performance is moderate, with no critical errors detected. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and does not expose sensitive data or vulnerable libraries. However, there is a lack of visible security headers and no privacy or cookie policies, which are important for compliance and user trust. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain trust assessment, but the website content and active social media presence support its legitimacy. Overall, the site is functional and professional for its purpose but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance, security headers, and clearer contact information to improve trust and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rapid-psary.cz

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
45
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
10
Average
47

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention rapid-psary.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for rapid-psary.cz right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The club holds a stable position as a local sports entity with a clear community focus. Its competitive advantage lies in its long history and active engagement through multiple teams and events. Revenue streams likely include membership fees, sponsorships, and merchandise sales via the e-shop. The target customers are local players, families, and football fans. Growth indicators include active news updates and social media engagement. Partnerships with EOS CMS and Sportfotbal.cz indicate a supportive ecosystem for digital presence and merchandising. Strategic observations suggest opportunities to enhance digital trust and compliance to attract broader support and sponsorship.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and no sensitive data leaks or vulnerable scripts are evident. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No incident response or security policy information is provided, indicating limited formal security governance. Compliance with GDPR is unclear due to missing privacy and cookie policies. The site does not appear to collect personal data directly on the homepage, reducing immediate risk. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small community site but requires improvements to meet best practices and regulatory expectations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to enhance GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers including Content Security Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen security posture.
  3. Provide clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for general and security-related inquiries.
  4. Consider adding an incident response or security policy page to demonstrate security governance.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to ensure no vulnerabilities are introduced.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SK Rapid Psáry
Description
Fotbalový klub již od roku 1931
Key services
Football teams and training, Match schedules and results, Membership and registration, E-shop for club merchandise, Community events and camps
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Alpine.js, Swiper.js, SimpleBar.js, Lato font from CDN
Frameworks
Alpine.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS usage implied by URL
  • No visible exposed sensitive data
  • No forms detected on homepage

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content about the football club
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided on homepage
  4. Social media links are present and active
  5. No forms detected on homepage; registration form links to external site
  6. No security headers visible in provided data
  7. WHOIS data unavailable, limiting domain trust assessment
  8. Website uses modern JavaScript libraries and fonts from CDNs
  9. No advertising or tracking scripts detected
  10. Content is safe and suitable for general audiences
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern front-end stack with Alpine.js for reactive components, Swiper.js for carousels, and SimpleBar.js for custom scrollbars. Fonts are loaded from CDNJS, ensuring performance and reliability. The CMS is EOS CMS, a specialized platform for content management. The site is mobile responsive with good navigation clarity. Performance is moderate, with some opportunities for optimization in image loading and script management. No major technical debt or deprecated technologies were detected. The absence of visible security headers and WHOIS data are notable technical gaps impacting trust and security.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rapid-psary.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rapid-psary.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.