Skip to main content

Security report for rapesite.name

Regtime Ltd. · Other · N/a

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

RapeSite.Name operates as a niche adult content website specializing in extreme and illegal pornography, including rape, snuff, necrophilia, and other violent content. The site aggregates and distributes a large volume of such content, primarily targeting an adult audience interested in violent adult material. The business model revolves around content aggregation, site rips, and providing download links, with multiple affiliate partnerships to similar extreme adult sites. The website uses WordPress CMS with common plugins but lacks advanced security and privacy compliance features. Contact information is minimal and limited to a contact page without verified emails or phone numbers. The site lacks privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies, indicating poor compliance with data protection regulations.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rapesite.name

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website occupies a niche market segment focused on extreme adult content, which is illegal or highly regulated in many jurisdictions. Its competitive advantage lies in the volume and variety of content, including rare and violent categories. Revenue streams likely include affiliate marketing and possibly advertising, though no explicit ad networks were detected. The target customer segment is adults seeking violent and illegal pornography. The partnership ecosystem includes several related extreme adult sites, indicating a networked approach to content distribution. However, the lack of transparency, compliance, and professional business information suggests a low legitimacy and high operational risk profile.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a low security maturity level. No security headers were detected, and there is no evidence of HTTPS enforcement or advanced security frameworks. Forms are minimal and lack visible protections such as CSRF tokens. The absence of privacy and cookie policies further indicates poor data protection practices. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are present. The site is vulnerable to potential abuse and legal risks due to the nature of its content and lack of security controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with strict transport security and ensure all resources load securely.
  2. Add essential security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Develop and publish comprehensive privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies to improve compliance.
  4. Establish incident response and vulnerability disclosure processes including security@ or abuse@ contact channels.
  5. Improve contact information transparency with verified company emails and phone numbers to enhance trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Regtime Ltd.
Description
All Forced Sex Videos, Rape Movies, Snuff Porn and More Extreme Videos on Our Site - RapeSite.Name
Key services
Hosting and distribution of extreme pornographic videos and images, Providing download links and site rips, Content aggregation from multiple extreme adult categories
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.1, Yoast SEO plugin, jQuery 3.7.1, Font Awesome 4.7.0, Google Fonts (Roboto), PHP (implied by WordPress), Pagination plugin, Sidr jQuery plugin, Cycle2 jQuery plugin, Easy Ticker jQuery plugin
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website hosts and distributes illegal and extreme adult content including rape and snuff videos.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. Contact information limited to a contact page with no emails or phone numbers.
  4. No security headers or advanced security measures detected.
  5. Multiple external links to suspicious domains and affiliate sites promoting similar content.
  6. Website uses WordPress CMS with common plugins but lacks modern security practices.
  7. Content is highly explicit and targeted exclusively at adults interested in violent pornography.
  8. No GDPR or data protection compliance indicators present.
  9. Website design and navigation are basic with minimal professionalism.
  10. No social media or verified business contact details found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.1 with several common plugins including Yoast SEO, jQuery libraries, and pagination tools. The design is basic and moderately optimized for mobile. Performance is moderate with no advanced caching or CDN detected. The site lacks modern security practices and accessibility features. External dependencies include Google Fonts and Font Awesome. The technical debt is moderate due to outdated or minimal security and privacy implementations. Modernization opportunities include upgrading security posture, improving compliance, and enhancing user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rapesite.name. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rapesite.name.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.