Skip to main content

Security report for raped.ws

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Raped.ws is an adult entertainment website specializing in free streaming of rape-themed pornographic videos. The site targets an adults-only audience interested in extreme and forced sex content. It operates a free content model supported by affiliate marketing to related adult sites. The website has been active since 2014 and maintains a niche position within the adult content market. Technically, the site uses basic HTML5 and JavaScript with Cloudflare DNS services but lacks advanced frameworks or CMS platforms. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization and limited accessibility features. Security posture is weak, with no security headers, no privacy or cookie policies, and an unsafe referrer policy. The domain registration is consistent with the website age but lacks registrant transparency. Overall, the site presents significant compliance and security gaps, with low trustworthiness and poor business credibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching raped.ws

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website operates in a niche adult content sector focusing on extreme rape pornography. Its business model relies on free content distribution and affiliate partnerships with similar adult sites. The absence of privacy, cookie, or terms policies and lack of contact information indicate low business transparency. The site likely generates revenue through advertising and affiliate referrals. Its market position is limited to a small, specialized audience. The domain age supports a stable presence since 2014, but no corporate or legal entity information is disclosed. The partner ecosystem consists mainly of other adult sites with similar content themes.

Security posture

The security maturity of raped.ws is low. While HTTPS is enabled, the site lacks essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options. DNSSEC is not enabled, increasing DNS spoofing risk. The referrer policy is set to 'unsafe-url', which can leak sensitive information. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating non-compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations. No incident response or security contact information is provided. The site does not appear to use any advanced security frameworks or certifications. These gaps expose the site and its users to potential security and privacy risks.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and other regulations.
  2. Add standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Enable DNSSEC to enhance DNS security.
  4. Improve referrer policy to a safer setting such as 'strict-origin-when-cross-origin'.
  5. Provide clear contact information and establish an incident response process.
  6. Conduct a security audit to identify and remediate vulnerabilities.
  7. Enhance website accessibility and mobile optimization for better user experience.
  8. Increase business transparency by disclosing company information and certifications.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Raped.ws is a website offering free access to rape pornographic videos, including themes such as brutal rape, gangbang rape, and forced sex. The site updates daily and provides a collection of extreme adult content.
Key services
Free streaming of rape porn videos, Affiliate marketing to related adult sites
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML5, JavaScript, Cloudflare DNS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
poor
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website contains explicit adult content focused on rape pornography.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No contact information or security policies disclosed.
  4. Site uses Cloudflare DNS but no DNSSEC enabled.
  5. No security headers detected; referrer policy is unsafe.
  6. Multiple affiliate links to similar adult sites present.
  7. Site content and metadata heavily focused on explicit rape themes.
  8. No analytics or tracking scripts detected in HTML.
  9. Site uses basic HTML and JavaScript for video previews.
  10. No social media or company contact details found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a simple technology stack primarily based on HTML5 and JavaScript for video preview functionality. It relies on Cloudflare for DNS services but does not enable DNSSEC. The site lacks modern frameworks or CMS platforms, indicating a basic technical infrastructure. Performance is moderate with lazy loading of images and videos. SEO optimization is basic with meta description and keywords present but no Open Graph or structured data. Accessibility features are minimal. The site does not use analytics or tracking scripts, which limits data-driven insights but also reduces privacy concerns. Technical debt is evident in missing security headers and lack of privacy compliance mechanisms.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with raped.ws. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review raped.ws.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.