Skip to main content

Security report for rantek.dk

NetNordic Denmark · Telecommunications · Denmark

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

NetNordic Denmark is a specialized service provider focusing on mission-critical IT infrastructure solutions including cybersecurity, cloud, networking, and collaboration services. Founded in 2020, the company targets businesses in Denmark requiring robust and secure IT environments. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand presence with clear contact information and multilingual support for regional markets. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern tools such as Google Tag Manager and Leadfeeder for analytics and marketing, and it embeds video content from Vimeo to enhance engagement. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enabled and no visible sensitive data exposure, though DNSSEC is not enabled and security headers are not explicitly detected. Privacy compliance is partial, with a cookie consent mechanism present but no visible privacy policy or terms of service. Overall, the domain registration data aligns well with the business claims, supporting legitimacy and trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      SSL Certificate Expires Soon

      SSL certificate expires in 27 days

      What to do: Renew SSL certificate before expiration

      • NIS2 21(2)(h)
      • IR 2024/2690 9.2(c): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 9.2(c): Cryptography
      • NIST SC-17: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-17: Public Key Infrastructure Certificates

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rantek.dk

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
50
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
73
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

NetNordic Denmark operates within the telecommunications sector, providing essential IT infrastructure services to enterprises. Its business model revolves around delivering specialized cybersecurity, cloud, network, and collaboration solutions tailored for mission-critical environments. The company maintains a regional presence with partner domains in Sweden, Norway, and Finland, indicating a broader Nordic footprint. The website's content and structure suggest a medium-sized enterprise with a focus on professional service delivery. Marketing and analytics tools indicate an active approach to customer engagement and lead generation. However, the absence of explicit privacy and security policies may represent an area for improvement in compliance and customer trust.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with HTTPS enforced and no apparent exposure of sensitive information in the HTML content. The use of reputable third-party services like Google Tag Manager and Leadfeeder is noted, though these introduce moderate tracking. The lack of DNSSEC and missing security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Content-Type-Options are minor gaps that could be addressed to enhance security. No incident response or security contact information is published, which limits transparency in handling security events. Privacy compliance is limited due to missing privacy and terms of service documents, though cookie consent is implemented. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be strengthened with additional policies and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to enhance GDPR compliance and user trust.
  3. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Add explicit security incident response contact information and policies on the website.
  5. Regularly review and audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize privacy risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
NetNordic Denmark
Description
Vi har specialiseret os i services og løsninger til missionskritisk infrastruktur inden for cybersikkerhed, cloud, netværk og collaboration. NetNordic leverer
Key services
cybersikkerhed, cloud, netværk, collaboration
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.1, Font Awesome 6, Google Tag Manager, Vimeo embedded videos, Cookie-script.com for cookie consent, Leadfeeder tracking
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure contact forms (implied by WordPress and no visible issues)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager), Leadfeeder
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Leadfeeder
Marketing tools
Leadfeeder
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well structured
  2. Content is primarily in Danish with language switcher for EN, SE, NO, FI
  3. Contact information is clearly presented in header
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found in provided content
  5. Cookie consent implemented via cookie-script.com
  6. Use of modern tracking and marketing tools like Google Tag Manager and Leadfeeder
  7. No visible security policy or incident response information
  8. WHOIS data shows domain is active and consistent with business claims
  9. No WAF or blocking detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.1, leveraging modern front-end assets including Font Awesome 6 and embedded Vimeo videos. It uses Google Tag Manager and Leadfeeder for analytics and marketing, indicating a mature digital marketing setup. The site is mobile-optimized with good accessibility and SEO practices, including structured data (JSON-LD) and Open Graph metadata. Performance is moderate, with deferred loading of scripts and lazy loading techniques observed. The domain is registered with Abion AB since 2020, consistent with the business founding date. No hosting provider details were explicitly found. The technical implementation is solid but could benefit from enhanced security headers and DNSSEC activation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rantek.dk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rantek.dk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.