Skip to main content

Security report for randonner.fr

Randonner · Other · France

Medium risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Randonner.fr is an official regional website dedicated to hiking, cycling, and horseback riding activities in the Aisne department of the Picardie region in France. It serves as an informational portal providing detailed circuits, thematic hikes, event agendas, and practical guidance for outdoor enthusiasts. The website targets a general audience interested in outdoor recreational activities and promotes local tourism. Technically, the site is built on WordPress using the Woody theme and incorporates modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery, Swiper, and Leaflet for interactive maps and user experience enhancements. The site is mobile-optimized and demonstrates good SEO and accessibility practices. Security-wise, the website enforces HTTPS and uses reputable analytics and tracking tools like Google Tag Manager and Smartlook. However, it lacks visible security headers and explicit privacy and terms of service policies, which are important for compliance and user trust. The WHOIS data for the domain is unavailable, which raises some concerns about domain registration transparency but does not directly impact the website's operational legitimacy. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy for its intended purpose but would benefit from improved privacy disclosures and security practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching randonner.fr

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
40
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention randonner.fr, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for randonner.fr right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website positions itself as the official hiking and outdoor activity portal for the Aisne region, likely supported by local tourism authorities or government entities. Its business model appears informational and promotional, aiming to attract visitors and outdoor enthusiasts to the region. The site offers curated hiking circuits, cycling routes, and thematic walks, along with event calendars and problem reporting features. The presence of detailed route cards with distances, difficulty levels, and towns indicates a well-maintained content ecosystem. The use of external map APIs and integration with the Office National des Forêts (ONF) for hunting calendars suggests partnerships with regional organizations. The site targets tourists, families, and outdoor sports participants, focusing on regional tourism growth. No direct commercial transactions or e-commerce features are evident. The lack of explicit company registration or contact details limits deeper business profiling.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security posture with HTTPS enforced and no visible exposure of sensitive data in the HTML content. The use of Google Tag Manager and Smartlook indicates tracking but also requires careful privacy management. The absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others is a gap that could be exploited in certain attack scenarios. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts are published, which limits transparency and readiness for security incidents. The WHOIS data absence reduces domain trustworthiness and could be a concern for phishing or impersonation risks, although the site content and technical setup appear legitimate. Recommendations include adding security headers, publishing privacy and security policies, and establishing a vulnerability disclosure process to enhance trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service accessible from the homepage.
  2. Implement standard security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to harden the site against common web attacks.
  3. Add explicit contact information including emails and phone numbers for general and security incident reporting.
  4. Establish and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy and security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to ensure no vulnerable libraries are in use.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Randonner
Description
Bienvenue sur le site officiel de la randonnée dans l’Aisne en Picardie ! Découvrez des promenades et des randonnées à pied, à vélo ou à cheval !
Key services
Information on hiking circuits, Cycling routes, Horseback riding trails, Event agenda for outings, Problem reporting on routes
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Woody Theme, jQuery 3.7.1, Swiper.js, Flatpickr, NoUISlider, Lazysizes, Moment.js, Leaflet, Tangram, MarkerCluster, Google Tag Manager, Smartlook
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager and Smartlook for analytics

Analytics and tracking

Services
Smartlook, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Smartlook
Marketing tools
Smartlook
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content about hiking and outdoor activities in Aisne, France.
  2. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual and reduces domain trust.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on the homepage HTML content.
  4. Cookie consent mechanism is present and functional.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content.
  6. Use of modern JavaScript libraries and WordPress CMS.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  8. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  9. Website uses HTTPS and loads external resources from reputable domains.
  10. No adult or NSFW content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern WordPress CMS with a custom Woody theme and integrates multiple JavaScript libraries for enhanced user experience, including jQuery 3.7.1, Swiper for sliders, Flatpickr for date pickers, NoUISlider for range inputs, and Leaflet for interactive maps. It loads resources from reputable CDNs and APIs related to tourism and mapping. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and lazy loading for images, improving performance. SEO is supported by proper meta tags, Open Graph, Twitter cards, and JSON-LD structured data. However, no explicit hosting provider information was found. Performance is moderate, likely due to rich media content and external API calls. Accessibility is basic but present. Technical risks include reliance on multiple external domains and lack of security headers.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with randonner.fr. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review randonner.fr.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.