Skip to main content

Security report for ramuluskola.lv

Other · N/a

Partial score · DNS & email only

35/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website cesunovads.edu.lv/rpsk/ currently serves as a security challenge page implemented by BitNinja, requiring visitors to complete a CAPTCHA to proceed. This indicates the site is actively protected against automated abuse or malicious traffic. The page content is minimal and does not provide business or organizational information, reflecting a protective gateway rather than a full website. The presence of outdated CMS meta tags (Joomla 1.5, WordPress 2.5) suggests legacy software usage, which may pose security risks if the main site uses similar versions. Technically, the site integrates Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for tracking, and uses Google reCAPTCHA v2 for bot mitigation. However, no privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies are present on this page, and no contact or business information is available. The lack of WHOIS data due to query limits prevents a full domain legitimacy assessment. Security posture is moderate due to the active WAF challenge and CAPTCHA, but the outdated CMS references and absence of visible security headers reduce confidence. Overall, the site is currently inaccessible for normal browsing without CAPTCHA validation, limiting content and business analysis. Strategic recommendations include updating CMS platforms, implementing comprehensive security headers, enforcing HTTPS, and publishing clear privacy and contact information to improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  4. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • Critical

      DNS Resolution Failed

      Unable to resolve domain A records

      What to do: Verify domain is properly configured and not expired

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ramuluskola.lv

This scan found 18 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Email security
40
DNS health
25
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
35

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the page being a security challenge, no direct business information is available. The domain cesunovads.edu.lv suggests an educational institution in Latvia, but no explicit business model, market position, or services are presented on this page. The lack of contact details and policies limits insights into operational maturity or partnerships. The site likely serves an educational sector audience but is currently inaccessible without CAPTCHA validation, indicating a focus on security over user engagement at this endpoint.

Security posture

The site employs BitNinja's security solution with a CAPTCHA challenge to block suspicious IPs, indicating a proactive security stance against automated threats. Use of Google reCAPTCHA v2 adds bot mitigation. However, the presence of outdated CMS versions in meta tags raises concerns about potential vulnerabilities. No security headers were detected in the provided data, and HTTPS enforcement details are unknown. No privacy or incident response policies are visible. Overall, security is partially effective but could be improved by updating software, adding security headers, and publishing clear security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Update all CMS platforms to supported, secure versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  2. Implement and verify security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Enforce HTTPS site-wide and ensure SSL/TLS configurations are strong.
  4. Publish comprehensive privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies to improve compliance and user trust.
  5. Provide clear contact information including security incident response contacts to enhance transparency and readiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

BitNinja detected. Page is a security challenge by BitNinja with CAPTCHA to validate visitor and remove IP from greylist. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Description
Website appears to be a security challenge page requiring CAPTCHA validation to continue browsing.
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Joomla 1.5, WordPress 2.5, Drupal, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, BitNinja security, reCAPTCHA v2
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
40/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA v2 for bot mitigation
  • BitNinja greylist IP blocking and CAPTCHA challenge

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is blocked by BitNinja security challenge requiring CAPTCHA validation.
  2. No WHOIS data available due to query limit exceeded error.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies detected on the page.
  4. No contact information or business details are present on the page.
  5. Site uses outdated CMS versions (Joomla 1.5, WordPress 2.5) indicated in meta tags, which may pose security risks.
  6. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager scripts are present for tracking.
  7. No visible security headers or HTTPS enforcement details available in provided data.
  8. Page is minimal and serves only as a bot mitigation gateway, not actual business content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses legacy CMS platforms indicated by meta tags (Joomla 1.5, WordPress 2.5, Drupal), which are outdated and may introduce security risks. The page integrates Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for tracking and uses Google reCAPTCHA v2 for bot mitigation. The page is minimal, serving as a security gateway rather than a content-rich site. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization and accessibility. SEO optimization is poor due to minimal content and no meta descriptions beyond generic keywords. The hosting provider is not identified. Technical debt is evident from legacy CMS references and lack of modern security headers.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ramuluskola.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ramuluskola.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.