Skip to main content

Security report for rakverekultuurikeskus.ee

Rakvere kultuurikeskus · Government · Estonia

Partial score · DNS & email only

52/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Rakvere kultuurikeskus is a public cultural center based in Rakvere, Estonia, providing cultural event hosting, room rentals, and advertising services to the local community and visitors. The website serves as an information portal for cultural activities and services offered by the institution. The domain is well-established since 2012 and aligns with the organization's public service role. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using a modern theme and several plugins to enhance functionality, including social media integration and event management features. The site is mobile-optimized and demonstrates good SEO practices, although accessibility features are basic. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and no exposed sensitive data, but lacks some security headers and explicit security policies. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism detected. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy, serving its purpose effectively with room for security and compliance improvements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Facebook, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rakverekultuurikeskus.ee

This scan found 17 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
52

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website positions Rakvere kultuurikeskus as a key cultural institution in the Rakvere region, targeting local residents and visitors interested in cultural events. Its business model is focused on public service rather than commercial profit, offering event spaces and cultural programming. The institution benefits from a stable domain age and consistent branding. Partnerships with local tourism sites like visitrakvere.com indicate community integration. The use of multilingual CMS suggests an intent to reach broader audiences. The lack of commercial advertising networks or affiliate programs aligns with its government/non-profit nature. Growth indicators include active event listings and social media presence. Strategic observations suggest potential to enhance digital engagement through improved privacy compliance and security transparency.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and no visible sensitive data leaks. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and HSTS reduces its defense-in-depth posture. No explicit incident response or security policy pages were found, which may impact readiness and transparency. The use of popular WordPress plugins necessitates regular updates to mitigate vulnerabilities. GDPR compliance is partially addressed via a privacy policy, but cookie consent mechanisms are missing, posing compliance risks. Overall, the security posture is functional but could be significantly improved by implementing recommended headers, publishing security policies, and enhancing privacy controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS to strengthen browser security.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner/mechanism to comply fully with GDPR and enhance user privacy transparency.
  3. Publish explicit security and incident response policies with contact information to improve trust and readiness.
  4. Regularly audit and update WordPress plugins and themes to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance website accessibility features to improve inclusivity and compliance with accessibility standards.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Rakvere kultuurikeskus
Description
Rakvere kultuurikeskus internetis
Key services
Event hosting, Room rentals, Advertising services, Cultural events and activities
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, jQuery, Smart Slider 3, Owl Carousel, Contact Form 7, Yoast SEO, Custom Facebook Feed plugin, SitePress Multilingual CMS (WPML)
Frameworks
Enfold Theme Framework
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security plugins (implied by Contact Form 7 and other plugins)

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Facebook Feed Plugin
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a public cultural center site for Rakvere, Estonia
  2. Content is in Estonian language
  3. No privacy cookie banner detected despite GDPR relevance
  4. Contact information is clearly provided
  5. No explicit terms of service or security policy pages found
  6. Uses multiple WordPress plugins for functionality and social media integration
  7. No signs of malicious or suspicious content
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using the Enfold theme and several well-known plugins such as Contact Form 7, Smart Slider 3, and WPML for multilingual support. It uses jQuery and Owl Carousel for interactive elements. The site loads external resources from Google Fonts and MaxCDN. Performance is moderate with some inline styles and scripts optimized for above-the-fold content. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design and adaptive sliders. SEO is enhanced by Yoast SEO plugin with proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). However, the site lacks advanced security headers and cookie consent mechanisms. Hosting appears to be managed by Zone Media OÜ, consistent with the domain registrar. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and functional but could benefit from improved security and privacy features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rakverekultuurikeskus.ee. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rakverekultuurikeskus.ee.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.