Skip to main content

Security report for rakt.lv

Rakt.lv · Other · Latvia

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Rakt.lv is a Latvian small business specializing in construction and road building equipment rental, along with related services such as planning, land preparation, and equipment servicing. The website presents a basic but functional digital presence using the Moze CMS platform and is hosted via Amazon Cloudfront CDN. The site includes essential business information and a Facebook social media link, targeting local construction contractors and individuals needing equipment rental and services. Technically, the site uses common JavaScript libraries and Google Analytics for tracking, but lacks advanced security headers and privacy compliance features. The login form is present but shows minimal security controls. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the site is safe, with no adult or suspicious content, but would benefit from improved privacy policies, security headers, and WHOIS transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rakt.lv

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
20
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention rakt.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for rakt.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Rakt.lv operates in the construction equipment rental and service sector, focusing on a local Latvian market. Its business model combines equipment rental with additional services like planning and landscaping. The company appears to be small-sized with a straightforward service offering. The website content and structure suggest a moderate level of professionalism but lacks comprehensive trust signals such as certifications or detailed company information. The presence of Google Analytics and social media indicates some marketing efforts, but privacy compliance is minimal. The lack of WHOIS data and privacy policies may affect customer trust and regulatory compliance.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and uses common security practices such as no visible exposure of sensitive data. However, it lacks important HTTP security headers like Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options, which are critical for mitigating common web attacks. The login form is functional but does not show advanced protections such as CAPTCHA or rate limiting. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts are provided. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and other data protection regulations. Overall, the security posture is basic and requires enhancements to reduce risk and improve trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear user consent mechanisms to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add HTTP security headers including Content Security Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to strengthen security posture.
  3. Enhance login form security by adding CAPTCHA, rate limiting, and secure password handling.
  4. Perform regular security audits and vulnerability scans to identify and remediate potential risks.
  5. Obtain and publish WHOIS domain registration details or use a verified domain registrar to improve trust and legitimacy.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Rakt.lv
Description
Rakt.lv offers construction and road building machinery rental, services, and maintenance. They provide planning, preparation, and installation services related to landscaping and construction equipment.
Key services
Construction and road building equipment rental, Planning and design services, Demolition and land preparation, Installation of utilities and landscaping, Equipment servicing and repair
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery 2.2.4, Google Analytics, Fancybox3, Bannerplay, ResponsiveVideos, Mozlive.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by canonical link https://www.rakt.lv/)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
jQuery ShareButtons
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error.
  3. No privacy or cookie policy found on the site.
  4. Contact information includes phone and obfuscated email in footer.
  5. Site uses Moze/Mozello CMS with Cloudfront CDN hosting.
  6. Basic security posture with no advanced headers detected.
  7. Login form present with client-side handling but no visible advanced security.
  8. Content is relevant to construction equipment rental and services.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  10. Social media presence on Facebook only.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Moze CMS platform and uses a combination of JavaScript libraries such as jQuery 2.2.4, Fancybox3, and Bannerplay for UI components. Hosting is via Amazon Cloudfront CDN, which supports good performance and availability. The site includes Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for tracking user behavior. The HTML structure is valid with responsive design considerations, but mobile optimization and accessibility are basic. SEO is minimal with only basic meta tags present. The site lacks advanced technical SEO and security configurations, which could be improved to enhance user experience and security.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rakt.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rakt.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.