Skip to main content

Security report for rakovnickecyklovani.cz

Městská knihovna Rakovník · Other · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and Security headers.

Security score

52/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Rakovnické cyklování is a local Czech event focused on cycling races and related cultural activities such as concerts. The website serves as an information portal for event schedules, online registration, photo galleries, and partner information. The business appears to be organized by local institutions including the Municipal Library of Rakovník and local clubs, positioning it as a community-driven event rather than a commercial enterprise. The target audience includes cycling enthusiasts and local residents interested in participating or attending the event. Technically, the website uses a traditional web stack with jQuery and Highslide for image galleries, along with a cookie consent script indicating some awareness of privacy requirements. The site is moderately optimized for performance and accessibility but lacks advanced features such as modern frameworks or CMS identification. The design is consistent and user-friendly, though mobile optimization and SEO could be improved. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and has a cookie consent mechanism but lacks visible security headers and explicit privacy or terms of service pages. The absence of WHOIS data and registrant information reduces trust and transparency, which is a concern for legitimacy. No critical vulnerabilities or adult content were detected, and the site appears safe for general audiences. Overall, the site is functional and serves its purpose as an event information portal but would benefit from improved transparency, security hardening, and privacy compliance enhancements to increase trustworthiness and user confidence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rakovnickecyklovani.cz

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
10
Average
52

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website represents a small-scale, community-focused event organizer in the sports and cultural sector. Its market position is local/regional with partnerships involving municipal and cultural institutions. The business model centers on event promotion and participant engagement through online registration and information dissemination. Revenue streams likely include sponsorships and municipal funding, as indicated by partner logos and financial support mentions. The partnership ecosystem includes local clubs, cultural centers, and sponsors such as a local brewery. Growth indicators are limited but the event's longevity (16th edition) suggests stable community interest. The website's limited digital marketing and analytics usage indicate a modest digital maturity level.

Security posture

The security posture is basic with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent implemented, reflecting compliance with minimal privacy standards. However, the lack of security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options exposes the site to potential risks. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, indicating limited security governance. The absence of registrant WHOIS data and privacy policy reduces transparency and may impact user trust. Overall, the site demonstrates a low to moderate security maturity level appropriate for a small community event but requires improvements to meet higher compliance and security standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve transparency and GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers including Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Improve mobile responsiveness and accessibility features to broaden user reach and comply with accessibility standards.
  4. Provide clear contact information including official emails and phone numbers to enhance business credibility and user trust.
  5. Investigate and resolve the missing WHOIS data issue to improve domain registration transparency and legitimacy.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Městská knihovna Rakovník
Description
Rakovnické cyklování is an event website focused on cycling activities and races in Rakovník, Czech Republic. It provides information about the cycling event, race registration, schedules, concerts, and related activities.
Key services
Online race registration, Event scheduling and updates, Photo galleries and videos, Information on races and cycling tours, Concerts as part of the event
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Highslide JS, Cookies Consent JS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by base href https://)
  • Cookie consent script present

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is in Czech language with some language selection options.
  2. Content is focused on a local cycling event with race registration and event details.
  3. No privacy policy or terms of service pages found.
  4. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented.
  5. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided on the main page.
  6. Social media presence limited to Facebook link.
  7. No visible security headers or advanced security features detected.
  8. WHOIS data is missing, which impacts domain trust evaluation.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a legacy JavaScript stack with jQuery and Highslide for UI interactions and image galleries. Cookie consent is managed via a dedicated script, indicating some privacy awareness. The site lacks modern frameworks or CMS identification, suggesting a custom or older platform. Performance is moderate with no explicit indicators of optimization or CDN usage. Accessibility features are basic with skip links and language selection but could be improved. SEO is basic with meta tags present but no structured data or Open Graph tags detected. Hosting provider and SSL certificate details are not available from the provided data, limiting full technical assessment.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rakovnickecyklovani.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rakovnickecyklovani.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.