Skip to main content

Security report for rakete.lv

Rocket Lasermarking · Manufacturing · Latvia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Rocket Lasermarking is a Latvian small business specializing in laser engraving, laser cutting, and personalized manufacturing services. The company offers a wide range of services including jewelry engraving, industrial laser marking, 3D glass engraving, UV printing, and custom awards. The website presents a professional image with clear service descriptions, client testimonials, and social media integration, targeting Latvian customers seeking high-quality personalized laser marking solutions. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using modern plugins such as Yoast SEO, Contact Form 7, and SiteGround Optimizer, with Google reCAPTCHA v3 implemented to protect forms. The site is mobile-optimized and includes a cookie consent mechanism indicating GDPR awareness. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced, but lacks some advanced security headers and explicit security policies. Overall, the site is trustworthy and well-maintained, though WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, limiting domain registration verification.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rakete.lv

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
35
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the manufacturing sector focusing on laser engraving and marking services. It maintains a strong local presence in Latvia with a physical address in Riga and multiple client endorsements. The business model is service-oriented, catering to both individual and corporate clients with personalized solutions. The website's content and branding are consistent, supporting a positive market position. The presence of multiple social media channels and client logos suggests active marketing and partnership engagement. The company appears to be relatively new, founded around 2021, with no parent or subsidiary companies identified. Revenue streams likely derive from diverse laser marking services and custom product manufacturing.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security posture. HTTPS is properly configured, and Google reCAPTCHA v3 is used to mitigate spam and abuse on contact forms. A cookie consent banner is implemented, supporting privacy compliance. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No explicit security policy or incident response contacts are published, which could hinder vulnerability reporting and incident management. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. The site would benefit from enhanced security headers and a published security policy to improve trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen browser security.
  2. Publish a clear privacy policy and terms of service pages accessible from the main navigation or footer.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and incident reporting.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
  5. Regularly review and update cookie and privacy compliance mechanisms to align with evolving regulations.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA "Numero 2"
Registration number
LV 40103611559
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Rocket Lasermarking
Description
We make things special. Personalizēti augstas kvalitātes risinājumi, piemēram, lāzergravēšana, lāzergriešana, zīmogu izgatavošana un citi pakalpojumi.
Key services
Lāzergravēšana, Juvelierlietu gravēšana, Lāzergravēšana pasākumos, Industriālā lāzermarķēšana, 3D gravējums stiklā, Lāzergriešana, Plāksnes, izkārtnes un norādes, Personalizētas dāvanas, Balvu izgatavošana, Piespraudes un nozīmītes
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO plugin, Contact Form 7, SiteGround Optimizer, Lightbox2, Google reCAPTCHA v3, Bootstrap, Slick Slider
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA v3 implemented on forms
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (gtag.js)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multiple service descriptions.
  2. Cookie consent banner and detailed cookie categories present, indicating GDPR awareness.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided including phone numbers, email, physical address, and contact form.
  4. Multiple social media links to Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp, and Messenger.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and plugins common in WordPress environments.
  6. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found in the provided content.
  7. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information.
  8. SSL is enabled and Google reCAPTCHA v3 is implemented for form protection.
  9. Testimonials and client logos enhance trustworthiness.
  10. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with a modern tech stack including Bootstrap for responsive design, Yoast SEO for search optimization, and Contact Form 7 for user interaction. Performance is moderate with lazy loading and caching optimizations via SiteGround Optimizer. The site uses Lightbox2 for image galleries and Slick Slider for testimonials, enhancing user engagement. Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics are integrated for marketing and analytics purposes. The site is mobile-optimized and includes basic accessibility features, though improvements are possible. No critical technical debt or outdated libraries were detected, indicating good maintenance practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rakete.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rakete.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.