Skip to main content

Security report for rakemeback.com

Sagebrook Ridge LLC · Other · N/a

High risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

RakeMeBack.com is an established online poker rakeback service provider operating since 2004 under Sagebrook Ridge LLC. The website offers a variety of rakeback deals, poker sponsorships, propping positions, and promotional events targeted at online poker players seeking to maximize their rakeback earnings. The business model is affiliate and promotional based, with a focus on trustworthy customer service and added value promotions. Technically, the site uses a custom or non-CMS platform with JavaScript libraries such as jQuery, Google Analytics, and Zopim Live Chat integrated for user engagement and analytics. The site demonstrates moderate performance and basic mobile optimization. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS usage and secure login forms but lacks advanced security headers and explicit incident response policies. Privacy compliance is basic, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy but could improve in security and privacy compliance to enhance user trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rakemeback.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
28
Average
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention rakemeback.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
111
Employees
0
Customers
111
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
23%

4 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for rakemeback.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

RakeMeBack holds a solid market position as a pioneer in the online poker rakeback niche, leveraging its long history since 2004. Its competitive advantage lies in offering high-value rakeback deals, VIP programs, and a Refer-a-Friend scheme. The target customers are online poker players globally, with multilingual support indicating an international reach. Revenue streams likely include affiliate commissions and promotional partnerships with poker networks. The partnership ecosystem includes recognized gambling support organizations like Gamblers Anonymous and BeGambleAware, enhancing credibility. Strategic observations suggest opportunities to expand compliance transparency and security posture to maintain competitive advantage and trust.

Security posture

The website exhibits a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and secure login forms. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No incident response or security policies are publicly available, indicating a gap in transparency and preparedness. The use of multiple third-party scripts introduces potential risk vectors that require regular auditing. Privacy compliance is limited, lacking cookie consent mechanisms and GDPR explicit indicators. Overall, while no critical vulnerabilities are evident, improvements in security best practices and compliance disclosures are recommended to mitigate risks and enhance user trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner and update privacy policy to reflect GDPR compliance.
  3. Publish explicit security and incident response policies accessible to users.
  4. Conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and dependencies.
  5. Enhance mobile optimization and accessibility features to improve user experience.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Sagebrook Ridge LLC
Description
RakeMeBack provides online poker rakeback deals and promotions since 2004, offering lucrative rakeback deals, poker sponsorships, propping positions, and monthly promotions including rake races and freerolls. They also have a Refer-a-Friend program and multi-lingual customer support.
Key services
Poker rakeback deals, Poker sponsorships, Poker propping positions, Rake races and promotions, Refer-a-Friend program, Customer support
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, jQuery, Google Analytics, Google APIs, Zopim Live Chat, Nivo Slider
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by script loading from https URLs)
  • Login form with password field
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
aff-online.com
Marketing tools
Google Plus One, Facebook Like, Twitter Share
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website content is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF detected.
  2. No privacy or cookie consent banners found despite GDPR relevance.
  3. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  4. Use of multiple third-party scripts including Google Analytics and Zopim chat.
  5. Login form present but no visible advanced security measures.
  6. Business information is clear but lacks direct contact emails or phone numbers.
  7. Website targets online poker players with rakeback deals and promotions.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a custom-built platform with JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Nivo Slider for UI components, Google Analytics for tracking, and Zopim for live chat support. The site loads asynchronously external scripts from Google APIs and social media platforms, which may impact performance and security if not managed properly. The HTML structure is valid and SEO optimized with meta tags and keywords. However, the site lacks modern frameworks or CMS usage, which could limit scalability and maintainability. Performance is moderate with room for improvement in mobile responsiveness and accessibility compliance. Hosting provider details are not disclosed, limiting infrastructure assessment.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rakemeback.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rakemeback.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.