Skip to main content

Security report for rajhrad.cz

Město Rajhrad · Government · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

51/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Město Rajhrad operates as the official municipal government website for the city of Rajhrad in the Czech Republic, providing residents and visitors with information about city services, local news, events, and administrative contacts. The website is built on WordPress CMS and leverages common web technologies such as Bootstrap and jQuery to deliver a responsive and user-friendly experience. The content is primarily in Czech and targets local citizens and stakeholders. Despite the lack of WHOIS data, the website presents itself as a legitimate government entity with consistent branding and structured data markup. Technically, the site performs moderately well with good mobile optimization and SEO practices, although some accessibility features could be improved. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled but lacks advanced security headers and explicit incident response contacts. Privacy compliance is partially met with privacy and cookie policies present, but no active consent mechanism is implemented. Overall, the site is safe, professional, and trustworthy for general audiences.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rajhrad.cz

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
51

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website serves as a digital front for the municipal government of Rajhrad, focusing on providing essential public services and information rather than commercial activities. Its market position is localized and essential, serving a small community. The business model is informational and service-oriented, with no evident revenue streams or commercial partnerships. The site’s partnership ecosystem includes social media presence on Facebook. Growth indicators are limited due to the nature of the entity. The lack of WHOIS data is a concern but does not necessarily indicate illegitimacy given the official nature of the content. Strategic observations suggest a need for enhanced transparency and security practices to strengthen trust and compliance.

Security posture

The security maturity level of the website is moderate. HTTPS is properly implemented, ensuring encrypted communication. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The site lacks explicit incident response or abuse contact information, which is a gap in security readiness. Compliance with GDPR is partially addressed through privacy and cookie policies, but the absence of a cookie consent mechanism is a compliance risk. Overall, the security culture appears basic and could benefit from formalized policies and technical enhancements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against web attacks.
  2. Add explicit cookie consent mechanisms to comply fully with GDPR and improve user privacy transparency.
  3. Publish clear incident response and abuse contact information to improve security readiness and trust.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities and maintain security posture.
  5. Consider verifying and publishing domain WHOIS information to improve domain legitimacy and trust signals.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Město Rajhrad
Description
Město nejstaršího kláštera na Moravě
Key services
City information, Municipal office services, Local news and announcements, Event information, Public service contacts
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, Slick Carousel, WordPress 5.9.12, W3 Total Cache
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of lazy loading for images

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a municipal government site for the city of Rajhrad in Czech Republic.
  2. Content is in Czech language and well structured with clear navigation.
  3. Uses WordPress CMS with common plugins and libraries.
  4. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual and reduces domain trust score.
  5. No visible contact emails or phone numbers on the homepage.
  6. Privacy and cookie policies are present but lack explicit consent mechanism.
  7. No security headers detected in the HTML content.
  8. No signs of WAF or content blocking.
  9. No advertising or tracking services detected.
  10. Website is safe and suitable for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress platform using version 5.9.12, combined with Bootstrap for responsive design and jQuery for scripting. It uses the Slick Carousel plugin for interactive sliders and W3 Total Cache for performance optimization. The site loads external resources such as Google Fonts and Facebook social links. Performance is moderate with lazy loading implemented for images, improving load times. Accessibility is basic but could be enhanced with ARIA roles and better semantic markup. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags, Open Graph data, and JSON-LD structured data for organization and webpage information. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. The technical stack is modern but could benefit from additional security and accessibility improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 51/100Medium30 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rajhrad.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rajhrad.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.