The website raetsmarine.com appears to be a parked or placeholder domain with minimal original content. The main page content is replaced by an iframe loading an unrelated external domain that serves ads and tracking scripts. There is no visible business information, contact details, or privacy and cookie policies. The domain is registered since 2008 with a reputable registrar but lacks any active business presence or professional content on the site. Technically, the site uses basic JavaScript and Cloudfront CDN for asset delivery but lacks modern security headers, DNSSEC, and HTTPS verification. The security posture is weak due to the absence of standard protections and the presence of potentially suspicious external iframes. Overall, the site is low trust and likely not actively maintained for legitimate business purposes.
Scanned ·
NIS2 and GDPR posture
GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
a(a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
b(b) Incident handling: One indicator
c(c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
d(d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
e(e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
f(f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
g(g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
h(h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
i(i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
j(j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
Partly checked
One indicator
Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
Email security
SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.
Critical
No email authentication configured
Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing
What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately
Security headers
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
High
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
Forces HTTPS connections
What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"
This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended
€25per month
TLS certificates and expiry
DNS records
SPF, DKIM and DMARC
Security headers
GDPR and NIS2 posture
Exposed services
Third-party trackers
Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
60
Not counted
NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
The certificate is not trusted by browsers
The website is not served over HTTPS
A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
The page loads a script from a compromised source
The domain registration has expired
SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Critical0–25
High26–49
Medium50–75
Low76–100
Breach exposure
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Dark web exposure
Add-on
Leaked records that mention raetsmarine.com, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for raetsmarine.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
No business intelligence or operational data is available from the website content. The domain age suggests it could have been used for a business previously, but currently, it serves as a parked domain with ad monetization. There are no indications of market positioning, target audience, or business model. No partnerships or subsidiaries are referenced. The lack of contact information and policies further indicates no active business operations.
Security posture
The security posture is poor. No HTTPS enforcement or SSL details are visible. No security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, or HSTS are present. DNSSEC is not enabled. The site embeds an iframe from an unrelated external domain, which could expose users to clickjacking or phishing risks. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided. Privacy compliance is absent, increasing regulatory risk.
Recommendations
Remove or replace the external iframe with legitimate site content to restore control and trust.
Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and enforce secure connections.
Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and other regulations.
Enable DNSSEC and standard security headers to improve domain and site security.
Provide clear contact information and business details to enhance credibility and user trust.
Site observations
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Generic detected. Website content is blocked or replaced by an iframe pointing to an unrelated external domain with ads and tracking scripts. Minimal original content present. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.
Business
Content quality
poor
Branding
inconsistent
Technology
Stack
JavaScript
Performance
slow
Mobile
poor
Accessibility
poor
SEO
poor
Security
Observed score
20/100
Analytics and tracking
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor
Advertising
Ad networks
AdsDeli
Tracking pixels
AdsDeli
Transparency
poor
Site quality
Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low
Key observations
Website content is minimal and replaced by an iframe to an unrelated external domain.
No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
No contact information or business details present on the site.
Multiple external ad and tracking scripts detected.
No security headers or DNSSEC enabled.
Domain is old but website appears to be parked or used for ad monetization.
No signs of active business operations or professional content.
Technical notes
Notes
The website uses minimal JavaScript and loads assets via Cloudfront CDN. The HTML is valid but the content is essentially an iframe pointing to an unrelated domain serving ads. There is no CMS or framework detected. The site is not mobile optimized and lacks accessibility features. Performance is slow due to external iframe loading. The technical debt is high as the site lacks basic modern web standards and security best practices.
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with raetsmarine.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review raetsmarine.com.