Skip to main content

Security report for radka-group.eu

RADKA Pardubice a.s. · Manufacturing · Czech Republic

High risk. 12 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 3 other checks.

Security score

42/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

RADKA Group is a medium-sized holding company based in Czechia with over 30 years of tradition. It operates multiple subsidiaries across Europe specializing in chemical production and distribution, industrial real estate rental and management, specialized industrial technology development, and water treatment solutions. The company targets B2B clients in the chemical and industrial sectors, leveraging a family-owned business model with strong local and international presence. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear navigation and relevant business content. Technically, the website uses modern web technologies including jQuery and Google Fonts, with integration of Plausible Analytics for user tracking. The site is mobile optimized and loads with moderate performance. However, it lacks advanced security headers and comprehensive privacy or cookie policies, which limits its privacy compliance maturity. No CMS or hosting provider details are evident, and no forms or direct contact information are provided on the main site. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and defers analytics scripts, but lacks visible security headers and incident response information. The WHOIS data is fully privacy protected under EURid, which is common for European businesses but limits transparency. No critical vulnerabilities or suspicious content were detected. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved with better policy disclosures and security headers. The overall risk is moderate with no blocking or WAF detected. Strategic recommendations include implementing privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms, adding security headers, publishing contact and incident response information, and improving accessibility and compliance features to enhance trust and security culture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

12 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching radka-group.eu

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
10
Average
42

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

RADKA Group holds a strong market position as a family-owned Czech holding company with a diversified portfolio in manufacturing, real estate, and industrial technology sectors. Its competitive advantage lies in its 30+ years of tradition, multi-country presence, and integrated service offerings across chemical production, distribution, and facility management. The business model focuses on B2B relationships with long-term partners and local-global operational balance. Revenue streams likely derive from chemical product sales, industrial real estate rentals, technology development contracts, and water treatment solutions. The company maintains a broad partnership ecosystem including subsidiaries in multiple European countries and a partner site (pevnespolu.cz). Growth indicators include consistent branding, multiple country domains, and active LinkedIn presence. Strategic observations suggest opportunities to enhance digital maturity and compliance to support further expansion.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is moderate. The website employs HTTPS and defers analytics scripts, indicating basic security awareness. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No privacy or cookie policies are present, which is a compliance gap under GDPR and related regulations. Incident response readiness is not communicated, and no dedicated security contact channels are provided. Data protection practices are unclear due to lack of policy disclosures. No vulnerable libraries or exposed sensitive data were detected. The security culture appears nascent with room for improvement in transparency and technical controls. Business impact of these gaps includes potential regulatory risk and reduced user trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add essential security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance web security posture.
  3. Publish clear contact information including security incident response contacts to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Enhance accessibility features and conduct regular security audits to maintain compliance and user trust.
  5. Develop a long-term security strategy incorporating employee training, incident response planning, and continuous monitoring.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
RADKA Pardubice a.s.
Description
Association of companies grouped in a holding structure. Production of custom compounds, distribution of high quality chemical products, rental of industrial areas including facility management, development and production of specialized industrial technology, and solutions and technologies for water treatment.
Key services
Production of custom compounds, Distribution of chemical products, Rental and facility management of industrial areas, Development and production of specialized industrial technology, Water treatment solutions and technologies
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.2.1, Google Fonts (Roboto, Roboto Condensed), Plausible Analytics
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by URL https://)
  • Defer loading of analytics script

Analytics and tracking

Services
Plausible Analytics
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Plausible Analytics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on main site.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly listed on the main page.
  4. Strong branding consistency and professional design.
  5. Multiple subsidiaries and country-specific domains linked.
  6. Use of modern fonts and analytics but limited security headers and policies.
  7. No forms detected on the main page for data collection.
  8. No explicit security or incident response information provided.
  9. WHOIS data is fully privacy protected with no public registrant info.
Technical notes

Notes

The website infrastructure is built on standard web technologies including jQuery 3.2.1 and Google Fonts, with Plausible Analytics for privacy-focused user tracking. The site is mobile optimized with responsive images and structured navigation. No CMS or hosting provider is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or static site deployment. Performance is moderate with deferred script loading but could benefit from further optimization. The absence of security headers and policy pages indicates technical debt in compliance and security best practices. Modernization opportunities include adopting a CMS for easier content and policy management, implementing security headers, and enhancing SEO and accessibility features. Technical risks include potential regulatory non-compliance and exposure to common web vulnerabilities due to missing headers.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with radka-group.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review radka-group.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.