Skip to main content

Security report for radionix.com

Radionix · Technology · United States

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Radionix is a security systems provider specializing in integrated intrusion detection, access control, fire alarm, and video monitoring solutions. Positioned as part of the KEENFINITY Group, Radionix targets commercial, educational, financial, and retail sectors with a focus on delivering mission-critical security technology. The website presents a professional and comprehensive digital presence with multimedia content and clear navigation, supporting a medium-sized enterprise profile. Technically, the website employs modern web standards including HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript libraries such as Swiper.js for interactive content. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with good SEO practices evident. HTTPS is enforced, and embedded content uses privacy-conscious YouTube no-cookie domains. However, the absence of explicit security headers and cookie consent mechanisms indicates room for improvement in security and privacy compliance. From a security posture perspective, the site shows good practices such as no exposed sensitive data and secure iframe usage. The lack of a published security policy, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure reduces transparency and preparedness. The missing WHOIS data for the domain is a notable concern, impacting trust and legitimacy assessments despite the professional site content. Overall, Radionix's website is well-designed and functional, but the domain registration opacity and limited direct contact information suggest the need for enhanced transparency and security governance to strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching radionix.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
50
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Radionix operates within the technology sector, focusing on security systems for multiple industries including commercial, education, finance, and retail. Its integration with KEENFINITY Group suggests a broader corporate structure and resource backing. The business model centers on providing hardware and software security solutions that unify intrusion detection, access control, and fire alarm systems. The company leverages digital channels such as LinkedIn and YouTube for brand presence and customer engagement. Growth indicators include multimedia marketing and downloadable product literature. The absence of direct contact emails or phone numbers on the site indicates a controlled communication approach, likely funneling inquiries through contact forms. Strategic partnerships with KEENFINITY Group enhance market positioning and operational capabilities.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to strong security posture with enforced HTTPS and secure embedding of third-party content. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security is a gap that could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. No evidence of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries was found. The absence of a published security policy, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms limits the organization's transparency and readiness to handle security incidents. Privacy compliance is partially addressed through a comprehensive privacy policy, but the lack of cookie consent mechanisms is a compliance risk under GDPR and similar regulations. The missing WHOIS data for the domain raises concerns about domain legitimacy and ownership transparency, which is critical for trust in security-related businesses.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner or mechanism to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations, improving user trust and legal compliance.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website to improve transparency and preparedness.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Verify and update domain WHOIS information to ensure transparency and strengthen domain legitimacy, which is critical for a security-focused business.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Radionix
Description
Radionix intrusion systems put you in control of a seamless, always-on security network, uniting intrusion detection, access control, fire alarm and more. Radionix, a part of KEENFINITY Group, builds on trusted technology to deliver mission control for your security.
Key services
Intrusion detection systems, Access control, Fire alarm integration, Remote security management
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Swiper.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure iframe embeds (YouTube no-cookie domain)

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multimedia.
  2. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
  3. WHOIS data is missing, which is a concern for domain legitimacy.
  4. Privacy and legal notices are present and comprehensive.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found; contact via form only.
  6. No explicit cookie consent mechanism detected.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy found.
  8. Social media presence on LinkedIn and YouTube is confirmed.
  9. Website uses HTTPS and modern web technologies.
  10. No advertising or tracking scripts detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript with the Swiper.js library for interactive carousels. It is mobile-optimized and accessible, with good SEO meta tags and structured data. The site loads moderately fast, though no explicit performance metrics were available. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. The absence of a CMS or framework identification suggests a custom or proprietary platform. The site uses HTTPS exclusively, enhancing security. However, the lack of security headers and cookie consent mechanisms indicates technical debt in security and privacy compliance. The site’s multimedia content and downloadable PDFs are well integrated, supporting a professional user experience. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from enhanced security and privacy features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with radionix.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review radionix.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.