Skip to main content

Security report for radicenter.ee

Radicenter OÜ · Technology · Estonia

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Radicenter OÜ is a small Estonian technology company specializing in web hosting and domain registration services. The company targets businesses and individuals primarily in Estonia and neighboring regions, offering a range of hosting packages with modern features such as cPanel control panels, SSD storage, and malware scanning. The website is professionally designed using WordPress CMS with a modern tech stack including Bootstrap and jQuery, and it supports multiple languages to cater to regional audiences. The presence of a cookie consent mechanism and comprehensive privacy and terms of service documents indicates good compliance with GDPR regulations. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, although the absence of security headers suggests room for improvement. Overall, Radicenter presents a trustworthy and professional online presence with clear contact channels and customer support integration via live chat.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching radicenter.ee

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
30
Email security
65
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
43
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Radicenter holds a regional market position as a web hosting and domain registrar in Estonia. Its business model revolves around providing hosting packages and domain services with value-added features like automatic software installers and security scanning. The company leverages a multilingual website to expand reach in Finland, Russia, and English-speaking markets. Contact information and legal documents are transparent, supporting credibility. The company appears to operate independently without visible parent or subsidiary relationships. The use of common industry tools and plugins suggests a focus on cost-effective, scalable service delivery. The partnership ecosystem includes language-specific domains serving as sister sites. Growth indicators include promotional discounts and active customer support channels.

Security posture

Radicenter demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enabled site-wide and a cookie consent banner that respects user privacy preferences. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the website content. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options is a notable gap that could be exploited in certain attack scenarios. The website uses third-party scripts including Tawk.to for live chat and Google Analytics for tracking, which are common but require ongoing monitoring for vulnerabilities. Incident response contact is available via a dedicated server issue reporting page and support email. There is no published security policy or vulnerability disclosure program, which could enhance transparency and trust. Overall, the security posture is good but could be strengthened with additional best practices and formal policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Publish a formal security policy and vulnerability disclosure page to improve transparency and encourage responsible reporting.
  3. Add a security.txt file at the root domain to facilitate coordinated vulnerability disclosure.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to reduce risk from vulnerable components.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Radicenter OÜ
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Radicenter OÜ
Description
Radicenter provides web hosting, domain registration, and related internet services primarily targeting Estonian and regional customers.
Key services
Web hosting packages, Domain registration and management, cPanel hosting control panel, Automatic web software installers, Malware and virus scanning
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.3, PHP, jQuery 3.4.1, Bootstrap, cPanel, Tawk.to live chat
Frameworks
WPBakery Page Builder
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with granular consent options
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Adsense, Google AdWords
Marketing tools
Tawk.to live chat
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is business-focused on web hosting and domain services.
  3. Clear contact information and support channels are provided.
  4. Cookie consent and privacy policies are implemented in compliance with GDPR.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and CMS (WordPress) with common plugins.
  6. No explicit security headers detected; opportunity for improvement.
  7. No suspicious or malicious content found.
  8. Live chat integration via Tawk.to enhances customer support.
  9. Multiple language versions available indicating regional targeting.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.3 with WPBakery Page Builder and uses Bootstrap and jQuery libraries for responsive design and interactivity. The hosting environment supports HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate, ensuring encrypted communications. The site loads external resources from trusted domains such as Google Fonts and Tawk.to for live chat. Performance is moderate with some room for optimization. The site is mobile responsive and SEO optimized with proper meta tags and structured navigation. No major technical debt or deprecated technologies were detected. Opportunities exist to improve accessibility and implement additional security headers to harden the site against attacks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 71/100Medium30 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with radicenter.ee. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review radicenter.ee.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.